![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
you do get the overall point that lewiston has been, at least in the past (the 5 words after the comma are just for your benefit), a major hub for taking offshore money? because if you concede that, i think it's for you to prove that's no longer the case. you should try politics/society. you're a natural for that forum. |
Quote:
Who else would have played a ticket large enough to cover a $63, $44 and $52 horse but a whale with a rebate shop? |
![]() |
Quote:
canadians? -bt- |
A buddy of mine told me today that the thoroughbred daily news reported that the one winning pick 6 ticket for Saturday was purchased in South Dakota for $48. They singled conduit and goldikova.
|
Some guys from somewhere in the Dakotas won it in 2003 with a rediculously low bet. Maybe lightning strikes in the same place again? This was also at Santa Anita back when it was a dirt track.
|
So much for your big rebate shop bettor conspiracies:
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...ge-ticket.aspx Was 48 dollars large enough for you Philcski? |
Quote:
The unidentified bettor, who placed his or her wager through the South Dakota-based account wagering provider Royal River Racing, played multiple tickets, but the one that included the winning combination cost $48 and singled TVG Breeders’ Cup Mile (G1) winner Goldikova (Ire) and Emirates Airline Breeders’ Cup Turf (G1) winner Conduit (Ire). |
Quote:
The writer of the article you linked is one of my really good friends. I talked to him today about the pick 6 payout actually and he was working on getting the actual tickets played to expand the article for print. |
Excellent. In the meantime, to what advantage does someone in that situation play multiple tickets?
|
Quote:
http://www.breederscup360.com/archiv...-steven-crist/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.