![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
IMO, there is no way Gomez is getting off Telling, a multiple G1 winner, for a non-stakes winner unless he thinks the horse can run decent in this spot, Hobby would have never made that change as in the time he was at Arlington, he would stick with specific riders to no end. Note that Grassy has one good soft performance also. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't read much into the jockey moves on either horse. Telling seems to be a one track wonder and Grassy is awful. NT |
I don't understand why they keep running Grassy in these races.
|
Quote:
He stinks. |
It is gonna cost me an additional $3 to use him on my P3 ticket that I am playing, so I'll spend an additional $30 total on him. I will take Gomez at 15/1 on a horse that just worked pretty good over the lawn, and has some prior off turf form. Especially when that additional $3 makes him 150-200/1 in the P3's.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Useless information but he has the distinction of giving Goldikova the biggest beating of her life last year :) |
Treat Gently is an interesting entry in the turf classic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Excellent point.
|
There was Majesticperfection....and then all the rest.
I can't wait until the Breeder's Cup Sprint. yikes. |
Quote:
Agreed. Without Majesticperfection this is some division. |
It would just be a perfect way to sum up the putrid state of the sprint division for Rudy Rodriguez to win the Vosburgh with a horse he claimed for 7.5k on Gotham day.
NT |
Anybody notice that Fly Down was purchased privately after the Travers? I wonder if he's Saudi Arabia bound after the BC.
|
He may win, and oh well if he does, but I think Paddy O Prado is an excellent bet against... especially if he takes more money than the ML.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Per DRF, Races 5 and 11 have been taken off the turf.
http://www.drf.com/blogs/belmont-fast-yielding-0 |
Well, I still don't think Girolamo is a sprinter, but I'm very glad he got his grade 1 - even though this was a very weak field. I'd prefer to see him in the Mile, but I don't think that's happening.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's your problem? Seriously - you didn't understand what I said? Do I need to spell it out for you? Apparently so. |
Quote:
He's a sprinter that can stretch out to a mile. The sprint division is really bad this year and he'll probably be 3rd choice at worst in the BC Sprint. He's running in the right races. |
Quote:
At this point, the Sprint is where he's going, so I'll have to accept that - and he does have a good shot. |
Quote:
|
Does Paddy really want a piece of this slow boggy turf course against older horses and 12 furlongs? I will play telling bearpath and winchester
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He won, so I guess it was the right move.............In any case, although I guess I don't sound it, I am thrilled that he won. I hope he runs next year........ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or was it yielding, but with firm results? Or was it yieldingly firm? Maybe it was firm but with a tiny bit of wetness. I wish someone could explain this stuff to me. |
Bleh.
|
Quote:
I thought Blame ran a pretty nice race all things considered. Didn't they hit 6 in 113.4 or something around there? You should be happy that Blame lost, as this makes it FAR more likely that Z will run in the BCC now. |
Quote:
I couldn't agree more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've always been a bit of a fan of both Winchester and Haynesfield, so it was kind of neat to see them live up to, at least a little, what I thought they could do. Winchester especially. I thought he was going to be a top horse after his win in the Secretariat. That seemed like five years ago. I also thought Haynesfield might make some noise in the TC races last year. I was a bit off on that one. My favorite type of horse is a fast one that is given an easy lead! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.