Life at Ten is a lock. Easiest money all year.

ZEN
 

I like Life at Ten to pull the upset.

http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/rac...al-Ensign.aspx

Thoroughbred Times just posted this analysis of the Ragozin speed figures for the Personal Ensign. Not just RA and Life at Ten, but all the horses on a handy dandy chart. No surprise they say Rachel's numbers are much faster. Didn't realize the Delaware figure for Life at Ten was an 8. I realize things can be visually appealing and trick you, but if Rachel doesn't get it done I certainly enjoy LAT a lot. She's fun to watch. I just want to see the RA of old. That's the story I'm rooting for the most.

What Thoro-Graph numbers are we seeing for this group? What have RA and LAT been pulling? And while I'm thinking about it, how big is LAT physically?

Life At Ten will be very tough for RA to beat, especially at 10 furlongs. Life At Ten might be the best older mare in training, so RA definitely has her work cut out for her.

Wolfson's horses ran predictably today away from Calder/GP, otherwise I really would love to take a shot with Miss Singhsix. If the top 2 hook up, it could set it up for her, if only I could be as confident in Wolfson's stuff in NY.

Zenyatta.

Who has worse comebacks....CSC1985 or Prostate Operator?

I get it now, this is your Classic pick, that must be why you keep bringing her up. Finally a pick on record, congrats on taking a big step forward.

You?

BTW you can't be Indian Charlie also? With your penchant for twin aliases? I can't tell at times.

CSC1985 in a landslide!!

Guano I & II. Nice to have them appearing at the same time. :rolleyes:

At least guano is a useful product, used to fertilize crops, to feed people.

You just use up oxygen and talk gibberish.

Considering how the TFM openly mocks what an awful opinion you have ....it's pretty funny to see you regurgitating his tired lines. Not as funny as seeing you try and use big words, but almost.

I am pleased you actually took the time to look it up, what did you use wiki?

Let's face it you love the term, you probably can't wait to affectionately call your co-worker Guano tommorow...Eh Guano?

I don't concern myself with him like you guys do, he has his opinions just like others here. No one has been infallible, so I don't know why you guys obsess over him. Infact I rarely talk to FM, why would I care?

Really miss you over at PA...

YAWN

IC and DaHoss are boring. Why do you feel the need to indulge them? You feed their need for attention.

BTW, a $39 winner, a $34 winner and a cold $61 exacta this week. And got nosed out of a 10:1 at SAR yesterday.

Still waiting for DaHoss to come up with his TEN > $30 winners over the past year or so. Notice how he's STFU when it comes to that. Of course, he's real good at those 5:1 pick3/4's. :rolleyes: And, ****ing with the women over at PA. Or beating up on halfwits in handicapping contests. Come on, DaHoss, where are your BOMBS? :rolleyes:

Oh, and, btw, if you're such a prolific winner, why is it that you were getting your PP's from RH10 for the past year or so? And, apparently, took a hissy fit when he cut you off? ha ha ha

PP's too expensive for a winner like you, DaHoss?:rolleyes::rolleyes:

you're done.

I miss the sheep over there, however quite frankly PA is an idiot, please give him my regards. He can't can't handle people with a real opinion so he picks and chooses who can converse over there. A real man. :rolleyes:

I knew I could draw him out of his dungeon.

Shockingly, your post is full of lies, which is why you should always consider the source.

I'd be interested in you compiling your ROI of posted plays. I mean, everytime you pick a $30 horse you talk about it for weeks on end (act like you've picked a winner before). Yet there is never any mention of the 30 or 40 losers you post before that. Wonder why.

BTW, I ran out of toilet paper earlier, can you print out a few fat charts for me?

You can try and diminish my handicapping all you want. I think it speaks for itself. but we both know you are absolutely threatened by the fact I am better (by a lot), which is why I seem to get a lot of your misguided bluster.