![]() |
BCS
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma 3. Texas 4. Florida 5. USC 6. Utah My prediction in bold. Scenario #1: Alabama and Oklahoma both win their conference championships and then play for the national title. Scenario #2: Alabama loses and Oklahoma wins. Oklahoma would play Florida in the title game because Florida would jump over Texas and into the #2 spot. Scenario #3: Alabama wins and Oklahoma loses. Alabama would play Texas for the title. Scenario #4: Alabama and Oklahoma both lose. Texas and Florida would play for the title. Scenario #5: Alabama loses and Oklahoma wins but Texas stays ahead of Florida (very unlikely should Florida beat Alabama) and then Oklahoma and Texas play for the title. Under no circumstances will USC or Utah be in the title game. Another question is who will be the three at-large teams for the BCS? The six conference winners are in and so is Utah. So that's seven. That leaves three open spots. Texas is 99.999 assured of getting one of them. So that leaves two. I believe that the loser of the Alabama/Florida game will get a spot. That leaves one spot. Texas Tech can't go because a conference can't have more than two teams unless those they have the #1 and #2 teams. So that would basically take it down to Ohio St. or Boise St. for the final spot. I'd say if the Fiesta Bowl has the choice, they would go with Boise St. but any other bowl would chose Ohio St. |
The biggest travesty in this whole thing is of course TExas Tech not playing in the Big 12 championship game. Oklahoma of course insisted on Texas Tech playing in this game by explaining that head to head means absolutely nothing as they beat Texas Tech and Texas didn't. Their circularity of course meant that Oklahoma and Stoops felt T Tech was the deserving big 12 south champion. Texas Tech beat Texas and Oklahoma didn't...plus Texas Tech beat Oklahoma State prettier than Oklahoma did. Therefore, according to the Oklahoma publicity machine the Texas Tech/Oklahoma matchup really meant nothing. Oklahoma tosses Texas game in favor of the Texas Tech game, therefore Texas Tech can toss the Oklahoma game in favor of the Texas game putting them ahead of Oklahoma obviously according to the Oklahoma argument. Their own logic and argument placed them below Texas Tech.
And of course Texas was also arguing for Texas Tech as they claimed they beat Oklahoma straight up...meaning their straight up loss to Texas Tech was the decider. Their own logic and argument placed them below Texas Tech. And of course MIke Leach brought up the graduation rates as well. So all 3 big 12 South schools argued for Texas Tech as the champion of the conference to no success. The pollsters have it all wrong. Texas Tech...the true Big 12 south champion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
(after a freshman dropped a lollypop interception to seal the game) and beat Oklahoma cleanly on a neutral field. Tech barely sneaking by Baylor sealed their coffin. Any team that gets beat as bad as Tech did... They are just not that good. They got Texas on a very bad game and barely won. Unlike most Texas fans, it does not bother me that Oklahoma went over us. You play your best and live with the results. We know the system has its drawbacks. No use to continually beating your head against a wall. The one thing I can make sense of is that out of those 3 Big 12 teams, Tech is cearly the NOT the best. Good teams dont get 65 or whatever points put up on them. Tech away from Lubbock can lose to any decent team. I think the King's scenario seems correct. Except I think Ohio St. has a good chance to replace Boise. Ohio St. has a huge following. And it does matter. |
Hey..I'm not a bcs fan because it's so phony.
But Ohio State or any other team like them.....check the schedules for whoever that team could be ...and then look at Boise. |
Humanitarian Bowl wants Boise and Ball St. Ball wants no parts of Boise on the blue rug. Ball has no objections to Boise as long as it's a neutral site.
|
Quote:
|
How 'bout this ? A play off system. Has anyone thought of that yet?
8 teams, the 4 BCS bowl games for the first round and....wait....have I heard this before? Well whatever.....just so everyone knows that it was MY idea..... :zz: |
8 team playoff
Penn st FL ALA Tex Ok USC Utah Boise St/Texas Tech Boise-Texas Tech/Utah fiesta USC/OKl Rose Penn st/ALA Sugar Tex/Fl Orange Fiesta winner vs Rose winner Sugar vs Orange |
Quote:
1) Idaho's close proximity to Arizona. I think in this economy, the fact that they are so close and travel expenses would be a lot lower for not only the team but the fans, that could play a role. 2) Boise's very successful visit the last time they played in the game, against Oklahoma. |
8 teams
Jan 1 Outback or Capital One 1-8 Cotton 2-7 Rose 3-6 Sugar 4-5 Jan 8 Orange 1-4 Fiesta 2-3 Jan 15 BCS Bowl 1-2 or 4 teams Jan 1 (Rotating the 4 BCS bowls every year) Orange 1-4 Fiesta 2-3 Jan 8 BCS Bowl 1-2 |
Quote:
Should be interesting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's probably a moot point though. Ohio St. would be the bigger TV draw even if they wouldn't be a bigger draw attendance wise and as I said earlier, the only chance Boise would have of getting selected is if the selection belongs to the Fiesta. Any other would automatically chose Ohio St. |
Quote:
nice try. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
4 teams play third weekend in Dec. and the first weekend in Jan. that would be a week off between conference championships and a week off before the NCG. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.