Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   CVS-- No Cigs (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53123)

randallscott35 02-06-2014 07:48 AM

CVS-- No Cigs
 
Gotta say I don't understand the rampant applause for this decision. It is a free country and they are free to not sell whatever the hell they want. The idea that they are suddenly mother Teresa for not selling them is ridiculous.

GPK 02-06-2014 08:57 AM

I retweeted this from marketwatch yesterday. Ballsy move to give up 2 billion in revenue. Personally,I don't care. I'm not a stockholder, so it effects me in no way at all. Seems like a holier than thou move and if you're gonna travel that path, why not quit selling all the candies, sodas, and the like that are major contributing factors to the worse obesity epidemic in history?

casp0555 02-06-2014 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 964042)
I retweeted this from marketwatch yesterday. Ballsy move to give up 2 billion in revenue. Personally,I don't care. I'm not a stockholder, so it effects me in no way at all. Seems like a holier than thou move and if you're gonna travel that path, why not quit selling all the candies, sodas, and the like that are major contributing factors to the worse obesity epidemic in history?

......cometics, alcohol, opiates....:D

Danzig 02-06-2014 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 964042)
I retweeted this from marketwatch yesterday. Ballsy move to give up 2 billion in revenue. Personally,I don't care. I'm not a stockholder, so it effects me in no way at all. Seems like a holier than thou move and if you're gonna travel that path, why not quit selling all the candies, sodas, and the like that are major contributing factors to the worse obesity epidemic in history?

:tro:

yeah, if you wanted to quit selling everything that can cause an adverse reaction, there wouldn't be much left on the shelves.

hoovesupsideyourhead 02-06-2014 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 964042)
I retweeted this from marketwatch yesterday. Ballsy move to give up 2 billion in revenue. Personally,I don't care. I'm not a stockholder, so it effects me in no way at all. Seems like a holier than thou move and if you're gonna travel that path, why not quit selling all the candies, sodas, and the like that are major contributing factors to the worse obesity epidemic in history?

true

bigrun 02-06-2014 02:11 PM

My local pharmacy stopped selling cigs bout 15 years ago...still can get them everywhere else..
Wonder if CVS will stop selling weed in Colo:D

Arletta 02-06-2014 02:31 PM

Who cares. .I never bought them there anyways.

Crown@club 02-06-2014 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casp0555 (Post 964046)
......cometics, alcohol, opiates....:D

.....testosterone.......

bigrun 02-06-2014 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crown@club (Post 964105)
.....testosterone.......

:eek:That's their best seller:D

hi_im_god 02-06-2014 04:33 PM

Sugar and alcohol can be safely used in moderation. The same isn't true of tobacco products so distinguishing tobacco from the others is pretty easy.

This is a fairly brilliant PR move by CVS. A number of localities have already banned tobacco sales from pharmacies. While not likely to be a tidal wave, you'll see more of that in the future. Why not get ahead of the curve and look like a white knight if you can see the end already on its way? $2 billion is 3% of their total revenue. Their future will be directly providing medical care at the stores. They'll cut loose a revenue stream which would decline regardless and look like heroes by going first. Smart play.

GPK 02-06-2014 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 964113)
Sugar and alcohol can be safely used in moderation. The same isn't true of tobacco products so distinguishing tobacco from the others is pretty easy.

This is a fairly brilliant PR move by CVS. A number of localities have already banned tobacco sales from pharmacies. While not likely to be a tidal wave, you'll see more of that in the future. Why not get ahead of the curve and look like a white knight if you can see the end already on its way? $2 billion is 3% of their total revenue. Their future will be directly providing medical care at the stores. They'll cut loose a revenue stream which would decline regardless and look like heroes by going first. Smart play.

Sugar and alchol can also be abused in the same manner as tobacco, and for many, just as addicting. If your future is in directly providing medical care at your stores, why not just go co-op, set up a hookah bar and everyone hold hands and sing kumbya in the midddle of the store while munching on organic kale? :D

I digress. My friend of Bill meeting starts in 15 minutes.

hi_im_god 02-06-2014 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GPK (Post 964122)
Sugar and alchol can also be abused in the same manner as tobacco, and for many, just as addicting. If your future is in directly providing medical care at your stores, why not just go co-op, set up a hookah bar and everyone hold hands and sing kumbya in the midddle of the store while munching on organic kale? :D

I digress. My friend of Bill meeting starts in 15 minutes.

Kev-

I know that for some there is no safe dose of alcohol. For most people though, it can be used in moderation with no health consequence.

The difference is that there is no population anywhere that carries no risk using moderate amounts of tobacco. That's a distinction. if you want to ask why a line was drawn between tobacco and the other products, that's it.

60% of cigarettes sold in America are sold at gas stations so it's not as if this will impact anyone's habits. They'll walk across the street. I'm not commenting on the morality of the decision but I admire the Machevellian genius of doing something they were probably going to be forced to do in the long run regardless. The other pharmacy chains are going to do the same eventually but they won't get the halo effect this has gotten CVS for being first.

GPK 02-06-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 964130)
Kev-

I know that for some there is no safe dose of alcohol. For most people though, it can be used in moderation with no health consequence.

The difference is that there is no population anywhere that carries no risk using moderate amounts of tobacco. That's a distinction. if you want to ask why a line was drawn between tobacco and the other products, that's it.

60% of cigarettes sold in America are sold at gas stations so it's not as if this will impact anyone's habits. They'll walk across the street. I'm not commenting on the morality of the decision but I admire the Machevellian genius of doing something they were probably going to be forced to do in the long run regardless. The other pharmacy chains are going to do the same eventually but they won't get the halo effect this has gotten CVS for being first.

I completely understand where you're coming from and truth be told I was playing more devil's advocate to your first post. Obviously I failed to do any research on their balance sheet as I didn't know 2 billion was only 3% of their total revenue. Only time will tell if this initiative will pay bigger dividends for them long term.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.