View Single Post
  #24  
Old 04-23-2008, 11:25 AM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
I think you're missing Phil's point King. Not to speak for him, but I think he meant more in terms of earnings against males. A case could be made that the fillies earnings shouldn't count, unless the earnings were against males, since the filly races are restricted to sex.
Correct, neither of them have to have run against boys yet to tell me they can compete this year, but I find it mildly unfair that they could rack up their earnings requirement in restricted races.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote