Quote:
|
Originally Posted by the_fat_man
I don't get it. King Glorious is an idiot who's been sucking my IGGY since just about the 1st post of his that I saw. Boggles the mind, then, that so many spend so much time engaging him.
HOWEVER, let me give you an example of how he's not off base in this case. (Since I'm forced to read his **** by the quoters.)
Steve started a thread about Mr. Hot Stuff. When I look at my charts for this horse's races I notice that his most recent effort is REMARKABLY BETTER than his previous ones. This could be attributed to, among other factors:
1) very bad field -- so he ran the same race but it just looks a lot better
2) significant improvement by the horse
I don't use figures and while they won't play ANY role in determining how I ultimately evaluate his performance, I, nonetheless, am mildly curious as to whether he earned a better figure than he had previously.
Simple as that.
|
Same here. I don't know the guy "King Glorious" so had some thought that there was some sort of logic to his comments. I was just trying to draw it out. I'm learning.