Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
technically, yea.
I'd like to see a consistent approach where the horse's name is meaningless. The only thing that should matter is the final time, and how fast the track was playing.
So we should be able to compare historical belmonts if we have an accurate measure of how fast the track was each time.
100 might actually be one of the more accurate beyer scores for recent Belmonts, but then a race like R2R's should receive around a 95...
I don't believe in adjusting Beyers for pace at all.
|
Then I pretty much agree with you.