Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
I hadn't been keeping up with this thread ... but I went back a bit and came upon this post.
Here's another instance of an otherwise commendable contributor making an inadvertent fool of herself.
The subject here happens to be a political topic ... but if it were UFOs ... it would be every bit as easy to regurgitate dozens of loopy sources who'd swear they saw the space ships ... met the aliens ... and went shopping at Wal-Mart with them.
Rosie ... this isn't any sort of way to make your points. When you bay at the moon with lunatics ... you soon become identified as one of them.
Use your own thought process and create cogent arguments of your own. This sort of stuff only makes you look weird.
|
If it makes me look wierd to you then so be it. It doesn't hurt my feelings any. I am very determined and will do just about whatever it takes to prove my point because I think that I am right. Give me some solid evidence to prove me wrong in that the government really isn't infringing on our rights and I will listen. I am trying to show these stubborn people the truth, but it is a lost cause. They continue to argue with the facts.
OK, BB, so just HOW did I make a fool of myself when I have stated that there are obvious biases in the articles, but there are some real truths to them as well. Some of the articles aren't biased at all, but are just providing unbiased facts. Most of the articles that I posted weren't editorials. They were solid NYTimes articles and USA today articles. They are also very easy to find, and it does not take them very long to look up. I have also read a lot of them before.
Oh yeah, and just for the record, some of those articles were all about being for Bush, and about Bush's new war policy. They weren't deragotory of Bush at all. So I guess that Bush is one of those lunatics...
Isn't it a fact that those for radical change in this country are infringing on our rights as citizen's with their new laws and policies? Isn't it a fact that the U.S. Constitution is being neglected in certain instances in which it wasn't back in 1996? Of course it is.
Go ahead, and depute the facts of this article. Show me just HOW this isn't true, and just how, from this article, anyone could possibly fathom that those in office aren't neglecting the U.S. Constitution.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...otesters_x.htm
I rest my case. Even if you continue to ignore the facts, the others see them. This thread has gotten tiresome. I'll start another one back up in a month or so...