[quote=Antitrust32]
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC
He won the Classic Belmont, then "developed" in the Haskell, and then won the Travers & JCGC.
You make no sense. He only "developed" in that race because its the only way you can make your argument.
|
Is it fair to say that Curlin was a more developed horse at the BC his three year old year than he was at Monmouth a few months earlier? Was Tiznow the same horse at the BC in 2000 as he was in the Pacific classic a few months earlier?
I think you can find plenty of examples, especially in three year olds, where there is rapid development and improvement within just a few months.