Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
The track at Hawthorne was incredible slow ... I wonder if they cut this race loose to get it where they could make it as slow as they did .. or if they just had virtually every single horse running below form all day long?
|
The variant was not split. I'm also not sure how you think the track was "incredibly slow".
The winner of the 1st was given a lifetime top in career start 24. It was 6 points higher than any in his last 10.
The winner of the 3rd was given a 61 after recording 54, 65, 67 his last three, 54 most recent.
The winner of the 4th was given a 57 after running seven straight races between 53 and 64.
The winner of the 5th was given a 75 after running his career high, a 74, in his previous race. This was start number 17.
The winner of the 9th was given a 92 after his last 3 of 51, 82, 89. He did come off a layoff and had some nice 100+ back numbers. The runner up will get an 88, a lifetime top in career start number 19.
Again, all used the same variant, including the Illinois Derby.