![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do...8&subs=0&arc=0
In this article, Andy Beyer suggests that the only racing in Maryland should be a short meet at Pimlico from early April through the end of May. He feels racing at Laurel should end completely. Here's my question (note: This is a question, not a criticism. I want to make that clear since there seems to be a problem here with interpreting questions as jabs): If Maryland only conducted live racing for 7 or 8 weeks a year, would that actually help the industry financially? It seems that even with better racing and increased purse money per race, there would be less revenue to go around. Am I wrong? I actually like the idea. I think we would see much better horses in MD. But would it do much to help MD racing? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I disagree.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I mostly agree. I would only run Pimlico for a week though.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'd run from Pimlico for at least 45 minutes or so if we're being safe about things.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i agree,finger lakes needs more horses..
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If Laurel were to remain a simo facility I see no reason why they shouldn't have a similar shortened meet in the fall and feature the DC International,DeFrancis Dash,Laurel Futurity and Selima Stakes as post breeders cup races.
Open the meet when Delaware closes and run 5 weeks through Christmas. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
No, this would not help MD racing or MD horsemen. Opening Pimlico for a short meet would help bring Pimlico back into the spotlight, assuming purses would be raised and many more stake races would be funded. Obviously, the building would have to be upgraded also. The losers would be the MD breeders, since there would no longer be a need for MD-breds, and the average MD owner/trainer. A short but sweet Pimlico meet would mostly attract better horses from all over - and while that's great for the fans, most of us longtime MD owners would be shoved aside because most of our stock couldn't compete during the high end meet. Closing Laurel won't solve MD racing's problems. If anything shortening the Laurel meet so it runs from mid-Aug to Jan 1, with the niche being turf racing, seems like the best idea to me. MD would also need to develop a circuit with Delaware Park and Colonial. My 2009 circuit dates would look like this: Apr 18 to Preakness Day - Pimlico May 20 to July 4 - Delaware Park July 5 to Aug 16 - Colonial Downs Aug 21 to Jan 1 - Laurel Bowie Training Center needs to be closed. Pimlico would close a few days after the Preakness - no training. Laurel would stay open year round for training. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Maryland breds could still have their state bred stakes races and Maryland Million day.I haven't followed racing in Maryland closely for 5 years but there hasn't been a race restricted to Maryland breds for the average maiden or claimer for almost 30 years. The state bred program is geared to allowance horses.
There are plenty of races in Delaware and Charles Town for Md. bred claimers to run in throughout the year when Pimlico and Laurel close.Virginia racing has been littered with Md. bred horses for years. I feel two shortened meets is worth a try at least for one year. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i think doing that type of change would hurt the industry in the long run. like phystech said, what about the breeders? you can't just look at the racing side-the industry includes so many more people than just the folks working at laurel or pimlico.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|