|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
06-26-2009, 01:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Real or Fake?
Sightseek and I were just discussing the merits of Chantal Sutherland's boobs, and the question remains-
real or fake? www.jockeychantalsutherland.com
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you 
|
|
#6
06-26-2009, 02:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
too bad she has no ass.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#7
06-26-2009, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well let me see here.....as a recognized expert on human flesh I will offer these observations concerning that which is likely to be natural vs that which was added as a high end option. There are two common mistakes that are evident in poorly constructed lunar accessories. 1) The first has to do with a nonphysiologic acute curve to cleavage most notable at the surperior end of this theoretical space. If cleavage appears to resemble a pair of nonlinear crescents or look like firm curves separating them in the middle of the line but never touching at the top or bottom. Her mother didn't give them to her.... 2) The firmness test, if you nestle up against a chest that bruises yours the chances are they are made of material that wont be nourishing the young. Perky can be pretty but pointy can be pointless... IMO the lady was born with what she displays but may have had an angle or two altered on her face....
|
|
#8
06-26-2009, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Real
|
|
#9
06-26-2009, 10:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Does it matter???
Anyway, I like to know what Freddy thinks about this.
__________________
"Change can be good, but constant change shows no direction" http://www.hickoryhillhoff.blogspot.com/
|
|
#10
06-26-2009, 10:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
06-26-2009, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A fine observation young student....very true
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
