Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2012, 01:01 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default End fossil fuel welfare handouts paid for by taxpayers

Quote:
It is important that the American people understand just how egregious these fossil fuel handouts are:

A Tax Deduction for an Oil Spill? -- We all remember the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the worst oil spill in U.S. history. What is less well known is that BP is claiming a 9.9 billion tax deduction on the money they had to spend cleaning up their own mess and paying for damages they caused. That is absurd.

They Manufacture What? -- Coal and oil lobbyists added fossil fuels to a bill aimed at helping American manufacturers, so they too could claim 'manufacturing' tax deductions. The added cost for taxpayers:12 billion over the next ten years.

Good Enough for Big Oil, but not Clean Energy -- Most of us have not heard about Master Limited Partnerships. These special financing arrangements allow oil and gas investors to avoid paying certain corporate income taxes, but are not available to clean energy businesses. Ending this fossil fuel loophole not only starts to level the playing field for clean energy investment, it saves the government an estimated 2.4 billion over the next decade.

Free Federal Oil and Gas Leases? -- Fossil fuel corporations are supposed to pay the government fair market royalties in exchange for the right to drill on public lands or in federal waters. But thanks to a loophole in federal law, some oil and gas corporations drilling in the Gulf of Mexico pay zero in royalties. The non-partisan Government Accountability Office estimated this could cost taxpayers up to 53 billion over the life of these loophole leases.
"Let's End Polluter Welfare"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-be...b_1531880.html
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:30 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Yes because we all know these upright, stately dinizens of our economy will just absorb that financial hit in their shorts & their shareholders will applaud footing the bill for this.

They'll probably just say "We've gotten fat off these *tax breaks* lo these many years, and well, gosh darnit - it isn't fair to our customers anymore. So we'll just agree to make less money".

Don't think for a second that they'd ever pass it on to consumers, or better yet sell it all to China and screw us all together.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:42 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Yes because we all know these upright, stately dinizens of our economy will just absorb that financial hit in their shorts & their shareholders will applaud footing the bill for this.
So you think it's better that you and I, the taxpayers, continue to pay to subsidize these private companies and investors?

Not out of my checkbook. But you go ahead.

If the companies screw their investors when they lose their tax breaks - well, that's just capitalism and the free market at work. Too bad for those investors. They should have attended their stockholder meetings if that's the Board they've voted in.

Right now there is no free market - these parasites are living off welfare: our government subsidies.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:48 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
So you think it's better that you and I, the taxpayers, continue to pay to subsidize these private companies and investors?

Not out of my checkbook. But you go ahead.

If the companies screw their investors when they lose their tax breaks - well, that's just capitalism and the free market at work. Too bad for those investors. They should have attended their stockholder meetings if that's the Board they've voted in.

Right now there is no free market - these parasites are living off welfare: our government subsidies.
I may be wrong but I think his point is they will get it from your tax dollars and if they eliminate that they will get it directly from you at the pump. Just think of it like everything else Lose/Lose for us.
__________________
Game Over
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:50 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62 View Post
I may be wrong but I think his point is they will get it from your tax dollars and if they eliminate that they will get it directly from you at the pump. Just think of it like everything else Lose/Lose for us.
I'd rather end the subsidies, and see them pass it on at the pump. That is the entire point of the article. It will even out the US market and show the propped-up oil industries for what they are.

The oil industry in the US has been an untenable bloated welfare recipient for decades now. They are getting bilions and billions of dollars from us. We're broke. It's time the welfare handouts to Big Oil stopped.

For the first time, we're a net exporter of oil. Time we used that cushion to wean the dependent off government subsidies, and allow the entire energy market to flourish.

Oh - and our pollution to decrease.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2012, 04:04 PM
Rudeboyelvis Rudeboyelvis is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,440
Default

Well his own Energy Secretary said he didn't understand why we weren't paying 9.00 a gallon for gas like in Europe, so it stands to reason that it sits well with you too.

As a consumer, you at least have control over these subsidies as they come back directly to you - that is the whole point of them. Without it, this entire country would stop.

What do you the the gubment is going to do with your money when they aren't giving it to Big Oil? Give it back to you? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2012, 04:00 PM
geeker2's Avatar
geeker2 geeker2 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,235
Default

and let's not leave out these Renewable Blood-suckers!

Energy Incentives for Businesses in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...209564,00.html
__________________
We've Gone Delirious
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-21-2012, 04:06 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeker2 View Post
and let's not leave out these Renewable Blood-suckers!

Energy Incentives for Businesses in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...209564,00.html
Exactly. Thanks. You've itemized the untenable, massive difference in government choosing winners (Big Oil) and losers.

Multiple billions to the oil companies and their stockholders at our expense, while the rest of the energy industry - inherently less expensive and cleaner to produce - struggles along.

We're broke. The massive subsidies propping up the record profit-taking of the oil industries must stop. Why does the number one company in profit in the country need billions in subsides? Let's end those subsidies, and use that money to pay down the deficit.

Quote:
Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act of 2012

S.2204, the Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act of 2012, would eliminate over $20 billion dollars of annual tax subsidies for “major integrated oil companies” – the five biggest, most profitable private sector companies. Smaller, independent producers will not be affected.

Last year, the five biggest private sector oil companies—BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Royal Dutch Shell Group — made a record $137 billion, and every additional penny they charge at the pump increases their profits by $200 million dollars per quarter. Yet each year Big Oil receives billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies. The Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act eliminates these unnecessary subsidies.

The only way to really prevent gas price spikes is an energy strategy that reduces our dependence on foreign oil by exploring responsibly and investing in clean energy technology. The Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act uses the savings from unnecessary subsidies for Big Oil to support growing clean energy industries like alternative fuel vehicles, advanced manufacturing, wind, and solar.

The Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act would renew incentives for clean energy technologies like the Section 1603 grant program and Section 48C Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit.

Additional savings from the Big Oil Subsidies ended by the Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act would also be used to help bring down the federal deficit.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-21-2012, 05:06 PM
geeker2's Avatar
geeker2 geeker2 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Exactly. Thanks. You've itemized the untenable, massive difference in government choosing winners (Big Oil) and losers.

Multiple billions to the oil companies and their stockholders at our expense, while the rest of the energy industry - inherently less expensive and cleaner to produce - struggles along.

We're broke. The massive subsidies propping up the record profit-taking of the oil industries must stop. Why does the number one company in profit in the country need billions in subsides? Let's end those subsidies, and use that money to pay down the deficit.
ah... no not exactly...but nice spin.

You demonize Oil & Coal and yet neglect to mention that Renewables are highly subsidized too.

If you leveled the playing field and let the best form of energy survive - it will - and it won't be Renewables.


If you had to pay the actual cost for Renewable Energy you wouldn't turn on your plasma TV.
__________________
We've Gone Delirious
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:04 PM
pointman's Avatar
pointman pointman is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis View Post
Yes because we all know these upright, stately dinizens of our economy will just absorb that financial hit in their shorts & their shareholders will applaud footing the bill for this.

They'll probably just say "We've gotten fat off these *tax breaks* lo these many years, and well, gosh darnit - it isn't fair to our customers anymore. So we'll just agree to make less money".

Don't think for a second that they'd ever pass it on to consumers, or better yet sell it all to China and screw us all together.
Amazing she doesn't get this. In reality it's helps the poor, could you imagine what the half of this country that doesn't pay taxes would do if they had to pay $9 a gallon?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:25 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

What's amazing is you rocket scientists think that eliminating billions in tax breaks for the big five oil companies will magically cause gasoline to go to $9 a gallon.

Do you know how gasoline is purchased for use within this country?

Apparently not.

"OMG, we can't get rid of tax breaks for Big Oil, they own us! They are holding us hostage for that money! We are victims of Big Oil extortion! We can't tell them to get off the government teat, they'll harm us! Give them more money! Give them the money! We love you, Big Oil - have some more tax breaks! You're just private companies, but you own the US government and hold us hostage to your private profit! "

Good lord. You'd think you guys who are all about small government and fix the deficit would stand up to massive private corporate bullies and their owned government Congressmen and Senators that are stealing your money. Instead of excusing the behaviour and enabling them. Let alone being afraid of them!
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts

Last edited by Riot : 05-21-2012 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-21-2012, 11:55 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

From what I have read we are producing more oil in this country right now than we have for a long time. There are new oil reserves being found all over the country yet we are still paying thru the teeth for gas. Something is rotten in Denmark....is it the oil speculators? Is it our own country gouging its citizens? We have oil rigs sitting out in the ocean here in Cali that we dont use and are just a shi tting spot for water foul, why? Its more than taxes and tax breaks and its way more than who is president.....we are being fleeced and the best way to tell them to go f*ck themselves is by buying electric cars and finding non fuel transportation for everyday life. When gas prices go up I know that I find ways to minimize my driving habits, I know that some dont have that option.
Oil speculators should be banned. What if there were wheat and corn speculators, would that be ok with the world?
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-22-2012, 12:06 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu View Post
From what I have read we are producing more oil in this country right now than we have for a long time. There are new oil reserves being found all over the country yet we are still paying thru the teeth for gas. Something is rotten in Denmark....is it the oil speculators? Is it our own country gouging its citizens? We have oil rigs sitting out in the ocean here in Cali that we dont use and are just a shi tting spot for water foul, why? Its more than taxes and tax breaks and its way more than who is president.....we are being fleeced and the best way to tell them to go f*ck themselves is by buying electric cars and finding non fuel transportation for everyday life. When gas prices go up I know that I find ways to minimize my driving habits, I know that some dont have that option.
Oil speculators should be banned. What if there were wheat and corn speculators, would that be ok with the world?
Yes, oil speculators have alot to do with it. Oil companies in the US should have to compete on a fair market with the rest of the country's energy manufacturers, not continue to get government gifts of billions of dollars bloating their already legendary profits and eliminating them paying their taxes. Coal and oil are ridiculously out of date as fuel. Even trucking companies are going to natural gas.

Part of the auto bailout deal was requiring the car companies to hurry up with mileage improvements.

BTW, there are corn and wheat speculators (futures traders). And there are subsidies for those crops, too.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.