A new all time low for partisan politics

[jms62]

What's next calling ISIS?

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...age-iran-deal-

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

When the nukes start flying, there will be a LOT of hand-wringing the left getting in bed with our enemies is very scary!

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff

When the nukes start flying, there will be a LOT of hand-wringing the left getting in bed with our enemies is very scary!

So then I guess you support undermining the office of the president as long as the offenders wear your gang colors

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by jms62

So then I guess you support undermining the office of the president as long as the offenders wear your gang colors

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff View Post
When the nukes start flying, there will be a LOT of hand-wringing the left getting in bed with our enemies is very scary!


A similar comment made during the Dumya reign of terror would be met with cries of "you don't support the troops", "you hate America" "you are not a Patriot" and a dozen others..

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by bigrun

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff View Post
When the nukes start flying, there will be a LOT of hand-wringing the left getting in bed with our enemies is very scary!


A similar comment made during the Dumya reign of terror would be met with cries of "you don't support the troops", "you hate America" "you are not a Patriot" and a dozen others..

[Pants II]

This will blow over like Hillary and Holder e-mail problems.

It's not like this is the first time politicians have trampled on the Logan Act.

Focus.

2016.

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

Originally Posted by jms62

So then I guess you support undermining the office of the president as long as the offenders wear your gang colors

He's NOT my president! you libs crack me up!

[jms62]

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff

He's NOT my president! you libs crack me up!

What really cracks me up are those that choose a side without any regard to the issue being addressed. I guess it is too taxing on the brain to look at both sides of the issue and make a decision on what is the best solution. Unfortunately these type of people have destroyed this country. Also I may be the only "LIB" that has voted Republican 90% of the time.. :

Oh and Obama is MY president just as George Bush was my president for 8 years even though I only voted for him once.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by jms62

What really cracks me up are those that choose a side without any regard to the issue being addressed. I guess it is too taxing on the brain to look at both sides of the issue and make a decision on what is the best solution. Unfortunately these type of people have destroyed this country. Also I may be the only "LIB" that has voted Republican 90% of the time.. :

Oh and Obama is MY president just as George Bush was my president for 8 years even though I only voted for him once.

Regardless of who is President, Iran is an enemy of ours. I'm with the red, white and blue gang, not Allah's.

[mark2061mn]

Originally Posted by Hickory Hill Hoff

He's NOT my president! you libs crack me up!

This guy's more your speed.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...6F7084B8DDA64D

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by mark2061mn

This guy's more your speed.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...6F7084B8DDA64D

"The only way we can win is to leave before the job is done." --George W. Bush, Greeley, Colo., Nov. 4, 2006 (Watch video clip)


"Anybody who is in a position to serve this country ought to understand the consequences of words." --George W. Bush, interview with Rush Limbaugh, Nov. 1, 2006

"You know, when I campaigned here in 2000, I said, I want to be a war President. No President wants to be a war President, but I am one." --George W. Bush, Des Moines, Iowa, Oct. 26, 2006

http://politicalhumor.about.com/libr...3b72b-0-ab_gsb


I gotta million of them

[Hickory Hill Hoff]

Originally Posted by mark2061mn

This guy's more your speed.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...6F7084B8DDA64D

My speed isn't a community organizer socialist history will show that and make Dubya look like Churchill........ and your guy like Chamberlain

[Rupert Pupkin]

Iranian Dissidents Criticize Obama’s Nuclear Diplomacy:

http://freebeacon.com/issues/iranian...ear-diplomacy/

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by jms62

So then I guess you support undermining the office of the president as long as the offenders wear your gang colors

I can't figure out why anyone would want to undermine the President on this great plan. Why would they want to undermine a disastrous plan where the President intentionally bypasses Congress? I can't figure it out. I'm sure they're just doing it to be mean, not to try to undermine a potentially catastrophic plan (a plan which he has no right to implement unilaterally, even if it was a good plan).

Obama does whatever he wants. He obviously doesn't believe in checks and balances. It was the same thing with immigration. He decided that he didn't need congress. He would just do it on his own. It's lucky for us that Obama is a genius and he is always right. I totally trust him to do whatever he wants.

Here is a little info on his great plan. Obama is a great negotiator:

http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...omes-together/

And in case any of you were wondering whether I would want a Republican President to just do whatever he wants when it comes to immigration and foreign policy, regardless of whether congress and the majority of US citizens are against the plans, the answer is "no".

[jms62]

I apologize for only reading the first sentence of your post but anyone that is justifying members of congress reaching out to foreign countries undermine the President of the United States is advocating treason in my mind. We have had many presidents in our history that many disagreed with but this is the first time I can recall something like this happening. Any bullshit propaganda you post for advocating treason doesn't change the facts.

[Pants II]

Originally Posted by jms62

I apologize for only reading the first sentence of your post but anyone that is justifying members of congress reaching out to foreign countries undermine the President of the United States is advocating treason in my mind. We have had many presidents in our history that many disagreed with but this is the first time I can recall something like this happening. Any bullshit propaganda you post for advocating treason doesn't change the facts.

It's a terrible deal that threatens our national security. They will be allowed to make centrifuges in an impenetrable bunker.

I grow tired of the disingenuous pandering and upholding of the constitution for a guy who has completely shat all over it.

If you want to play the 'treason' game then you're going down a dangerous path.

What happens to those of you who went on a witchhunt of these congressman if dirty bombs are detonated in multiple western cities?

That's right. Nothing. Because most traitors will never be held accountable.

I will never support an office just for the sake of it. Especially one that doesn't follow the law of the land.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by jms62

I apologize for only reading the first sentence of your post but anyone that is justifying members of congress reaching out to foreign countries undermine the President of the United States is advocating treason in my mind. We have had many presidents in our history that many disagreed with but this is the first time I can recall something like this happening. Any bullshit propaganda you post for advocating treason doesn't change the facts.

Yep. Even if you disagree with the man, orr hate him, you are supposed to respect the office. I think their actions completely embarrassed this country at the very least. Inviting a foreign head of state to give that speech is a new low...the letter to Iran showed they were determined to race to the bottom. That trying to produce gotcha moments is more important than this country, its standing. Its a disgrace.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

I can't figure out why anyone would want to undermine the President on this great plan. Why would they want to undermine a disastrous plan where the President intentionally bypasses Congress? I can't figure it out. I'm sure they're just doing it to be mean, not to try to undermine a potentially catastrophic plan (a plan which he has no right to implement unilaterally, even if it was a good plan).

Obama does whatever he wants. He obviously doesn't believe in checks and balances. It was the same thing with immigration. He decided that he didn't need congress. He would just do it on his own. It's lucky for us that Obama is a genius and he is always right. I totally trust him to do whatever he wants.

Here is a little info on his great plan. Obama is a great negotiator:

http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...omes-together/

And in case any of you were wondering whether I would want a Republican President to just do whatever he wants when it comes to immigration and foreign policy, regardless of whether congress and the majority of US citizens are against the plans, the answer is "no".

Originally Posted by jms62

Any bullshit propaganda you post for advocating treason doesn't change the facts.

jim is right on rupe and you know it..

And other country leaders are offering help.

MARCH 10, 2015
Kim Jong-un Feels Snubbed by Absence of Letter from Republicans.

The North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un said on Tuesday that he feels “snubbed” by the decision of forty-seven Republican senators to write a letter to Iran but not to him, the official North Korean news agency reported.




TEHRAN (The Borowitz Report)—Stating that “their continuing hostilities are a threat to world peace,” Iran has offered to mediate talks between congressional Republicans and President Obama.

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, made the offer one day after Iran received what he called a “worrisome letter” from Republican leaders, which suggested to him that “the relationship between Republicans and Obama has deteriorated dangerously.”

[Rupert Pupkin]

I wonder if you guys even know what the letter said. Obama is trying to make a deal with Iran without getting any input form congress. It's not just the republicans in congress that are against this deal. Plenty of democrats are against it including the highest ranking democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

So Obama is trying to make this deal by executive action, meaning that congress has no input. Congress is totally against the deal. When something like this is done by executive action, congress can't stop it. But once Obama leaves office, the next administration can nix the deal with the strike of a pen. That is the negative about doing a deal by executive action.

Anyway, all the 47 Senators did in their letter was to explain this to Iran. They explained to Iran how the law works here. They explained to them that this deal is being done by executive action without the support of congress and that the next administration can nix the deal.

You guys believe all the hysterics written by the liberal media when in fact the letter simply explained the law to Iran. I think it is a good thing that Iran understands that. If Obama was smart, he would only make the deal with congressional approval and get them to sign off on it. Then the next administration would not be able to nix the deal. He won't do that because he can't even get support from senate democrats for the deal, because it is obviously a bad deal.

With regard to one of you that said this is like treason, if anyone is committing treason, it would be the person trying to make this deal against the wishes of both republicans and democrats in congress.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by jms62

What's next calling ISIS?

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/ar...age-iran-deal-

I'm sure he has already called the 'junior varsity team'. On a Obama throw away phone. All to do with transparency never been seen before

But on the bright side, with Global Warming being the biggest threat to the planet, Iranian nukes may be the only way to kill off enough people and save the world.

Hey look, a baker who won't make gay wedding cupcakes.