the 2005 whitney..how much.....

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

would st laim have one by if not for the high wt.....commentator 115..st laim 122....

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

would st laim have one by if not for the high wt.....commentator 115..st laim 122....

I like the way you think!

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

comentator was never the same after that....

[blackthroatedwind]

I don't think weight matters, but that's just me and I suppose I could be wrong, but I never understood why people suggested after the race that Saint Liam was best. Commentator set an extremely honest pace and Saint Liam had the entire stretch to beat him and flat out lost.

If Dutrow was so confident he had the better horse why did he run, not one but, two rabbits in the Woodward?

And, yes, I am way biased about this one.

[Sightseek]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I don't think weight matters, but that's just me and I suppose I could be wrong, but I never understood why people suggested after the race that Saint Liam was best. Commentator set an extremely honest pace and Saint Liam had the entire stretch to beat him and flat out lost.

If Dutrow was so confident he had the better horse why did he run, not one but, two rabbits in the Woodward?

And, yes, I am way biased about this one.

As Dutrow said, he didn't want Saint Liam all out to defeat Commentator as he had bigger and better races to win.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Running two rabbits at a horse, in a Grade 1 race, with a five horse field, was about as unsporting a move as I've seen, in all the time I followed racing.

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I don't think weight matters, but that's just me and I suppose I could be wrong, but I never understood why people suggested after the race that Saint Liam was best. Commentator set an extremely honest pace and Saint Liam had the entire stretch to beat him and flat out lost.

If Dutrow was so confident he had the better horse why did he run, not one but, two rabbits in the Woodward?

And, yes, I am way biased about this one.

I agree with you about weight being overrated although perhaps Saint Liam wins by a nose with equal weights. A major reason that Dutrow used the rabbits in the Woodward wasn't because he thought his horse couldn't beat Commentator, it was because he thought he could beat Commentator more easily with the rabbits and didn't want the race to take too much out of him before the Classic. The prior year going neck and neck with Ghostzapper took so much out of the horse that he couldn't bring him back in the Classic and he knew he wouldn't have forgiven himself if he let that happen again. He talked about it on Capital OTB one morning, interesting interview.

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I remember that interview. I guess I just thought it was sh*tty with the 2 rabbits. I know all it's all fair, but it just seemed desperate. Would 1 rabbit not have been enough?

If one works well then two can only work better. Personally I'm not a big fan of horses that can get thrown off their game so much by a couple rabbits so I thought the situation was pretty funny. If Commentator comes back this year then Zito should pair him with Sun King. If anyone tries to put rabbits against Commentator it will set things up perfect for Sun King. If there is no other speed to duel then Commentator wins it on the front end.

[brockguy]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I don't think weight matters, but that's just me.

weight supposedly is the biggest difference between european and US handicappers. We think it does matter, and ye think it doesn't..

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by brockguy

weight supposedly is the biggest difference between european and US handicappers. We think it does matter, and ye think it doesn't..

Ye? I feel like we should be discussing this over mugs of meade.

Sorry....couldn't resist.

Originally Posted by brockguy

weight supposedly is the biggest difference between european and US handicappers. We think it does matter, and ye think it doesn't..

weight matters more for you guys cause you run in moss bogs while chasing foxes over 13 mile courses.

but its probably much better for the horses.

Seriously. I think weight takes a lot more out of a horse in the longer Euro undulating soft grass courses.

[POINTGIVEN1985]

i also had commentator very heavy that day, but bias or not commentator is a very good horse, could still be great, i think he wins anyway you want to look at it, and its a shame that he cant stay healthy