|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Del Mar outshines Saratoga
better quality racing, and a better track in the best setting
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
They could hold the Saratoga meet in the middle of Idaho and it would be better than Del Mar.
Who cares where the setting is? If they paved out a racetrack at our local dump and had the quality that they do at Saratoga, I would be there for sure. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I think someone is suffering from delusions due to the excessive heat.
Each location has its strong points, but for the racing quality you've got to go with the Spa. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle likes the attention his ridiculous posts provide..he is like a dog, ignore him and he will knock it off and actually contribute something worthwhile
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have been to both and the racing at Saratoga is far superior to Del Mar. Del Mar is a better time overall because of the city it is located in, but the racing at the spa is just better. The weather though goes to DelMar in a landslide. Only the Keeneland meet is comparble, and Saratoga is still a little better than Keeneland.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I live an hour north of Del Mar.. never have been to Saratoga.
As a horse player.. I'll take Saratoga every time.. For a good time.. You'd be hard pressed to find a better place than Del Mar. It is awesome. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|