|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
State by State
270 electoral votes needed to win it.
These 4 states are close: CO(9) OH(20) VA(13) NV(5) I'll call the other 46 (because I can easily handle such a task.) Pro-Obama States (TOTAL: 264 electoral votes) PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT...don't forget D.C.(3 ELEC. VOTES....BELIEVE IT OR NOT.) Pro-McCain States (total:227 electoral votes...of course...the predominant thing in common is most of the states that had slavery ain't having OBAMA.) AL AZ AR FL SD AK GA NC ND ID IN KS MO KY LA MS MT NE OK SC TN UT WV WY TX NH,AND NM could be soft,but I think Obama will take them. Florida could be soft, but I expect it's McCain's. If Florida or Ohio go for Obama, then JohnnyCat, you are dead. Funny how 2 states that are normally battleground states(Missouri,and Arkansas) aren't even close when a brotha is involved. Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 09-05-2008 at 09:23 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Don't be so sure about MA.. Right now it's McCain-44%, Obama-45%, and undecided-11%.
I would have sworn Obama would be way ahead in my extremely liberal state. Then again, I don't have much faith in polls. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
mccain won't spend any more effort campaigning there than obama will in alaska. and for the same reason. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
that's probably a good snapshot if the vote was held today.
but it could change in 2 months. obama has a ground war where he just needs to grind it out and hope the economy and unpopular war carry him. but he can't make any mistakes. i think the republican's nominated the only candidate they had that wouldn't get swamped. he's a moderate who has significant policy differences with the disastrously incompetent leadership in the white house. it could still be a close republican win. but it could also be a close democratic win or a significant one. absent another terrorist attack there's no chance for a sweeping republican win. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever." hi im god quote |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
PA CA DE HI MI NH OR NJ WA IA WI NM CT MN IL ME MD MA NY RI VT District of Columbia, but there certainly is no other state that he can rely on. My guess is he loses Nevada, Colorado, and Ohio, and barely gets home by winning Virginia. For some reason, Virginia is pretty consistently polling for him by a sliver. It's going to be a very close election. He needs one more state, and he is gunna have to work very hard to get it. I think he gave up on Florida, and went for a V.P. that would help solidify Michigan, and give him an outside shot of winning Ohio. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
not a chance in hell he carries VA. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
McCain will win comfortably. i said it as soon as he won New Hampshire, and nothing has changed. in fact, the situation vastly improved for him this week.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
^ afterglow. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
8/22 polling...hard to believe things have gotten worse for the RED team http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...college_update
__________________
We've Gone Delirious |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I will assume you did not predict Ike, due to age concerns. 1960- Kennedy (good job it was close) 1964 -Johnson (landslide, very easy) 1968 -Nixon (easy with wallace pulling from Humphrey) 1972 - Nixon (If you missed this, your prognostication was severly retarded) 1976 - Carter (great job, very close) 1980 - Reagan (If you missed this, your prognostication was severly retarded) 1984 - Reagan (ditto) 1988 - Bush (ditto) 1992 - Clinton (you had to get this one also) 1996 - Clinton (ditto) 2000- Bush (good job) 2004 - Bush (not as good as 2000 but good) So you are 3-1. Now you risk going 3-2 in elections that actually required some thought. Dont do it man. This could easily swing either way. Look back at the electoral map. Those states that are contested could swing either way in the next two months, very easily. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
i know the partisans have to paint everything in black and white and i understand the dems have to make this about another bush term. but there's a reason mccain has been held at arms length by his own party for so long. he really has taken principled position's that have cost him politically. he's likely the best candidate for president i will ever vote against. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
still a lot of racism down here, but i doubt i'm telling anyone something they don't know. they painted the picture today in the paper that this state is solidly behind mccain/palin due to the vp pick, but i doubt that's the case. altho we are a mainly democratic state, there are many who won't vote for obama based on his race, and a lot of misinformation.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I agree, there are many that won't vote for Obama based on race....they just won't admit it publicly in the primary exit polls or any of the current polls. It is easy for a person to say they'd vote for him and race doesn't matter, but when they go behind that curtain, will they really pull the lever? |