Voters being illegally removed from rolls

ateamstupid · #1 10-09-2008, 01:26 AM

This is bad.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27093919/

Honu · #2 10-09-2008, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

This is bad.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27093919/

Its bad because of what ? Bad because people couldnt do the simple thing of showing their drivers liscence or state ID to register to vote or bad because they found alot of people who are not eligible to vote trying to?

ateamstupid · #3 10-09-2008, 01:55 AM

You clearly didn't read a word of the article, and if you did, you grossly misinterpreted it.

Since I doubt your ignorant ass would bother to try to understand it the second time around..

There's a federal law requiring that state identification databases be used first to confirm voter eligibility and Social Security be used only as a last resort, since the database is fraught with errors.

Certain states are not using state identification first and are wrongly flagging registrations as invalid because of Social Security database errors. Many of these new voters are being illegally taken off the rolls, without notice. You don't see anything wrong with that?

Mike · #4 10-09-2008, 08:26 AM

Not directly related to this, but I saw the great

James Carville on CNN the other night, immediately after the debate. He brought up the prospect of what might happen if Obama goes into election day with a widely reported 6,8 or 10 point lead in the polls, then loses to McCain. He didn't elaborate, but suggested that there would be real ugliness to follow. I don't think he meant just the black communities would revolt. Liberal, and now all Dems , were pushed to the edge with the GW Bush election result.

If Obama loses, I won't believe it

jwkniska · #5 10-09-2008, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike

Not directly related to this, but I saw the great

James Carville on CNN the other night, immediately after the debate. He brought up the prospect of what might happen if Obama goes into election day with a widely reported 6,8 or 10 point lead in the polls, then loses to McCain. He didn't elaborate, but suggested that there would be real ugliness to follow. I don't think he meant just the black communities would revolt. Liberal, and now all Dems , were pushed to the edge with the GW Bush election result.

If Obama loses, I won't believe it

if it happens, then that should really tell you how liberal the media is... and how much they fudge all the info they supposedly report.

SniperSB23 · #6 10-09-2008, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwkniska

if it happens, then that should really tell you how liberal the media is... and how much they fudge all the info they supposedly report.

Rasmussen/FoxNews matches the other polls so the idea that the media bias is skewing them is ridiculous unless you honestly believe that Fox News is biased towards liberals.

ateamstupid · #7 10-09-2008, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwkniska

if it happens, then that should really tell you how liberal the media is... and how much they fudge all the info they supposedly report.

Where do they grow morons like this? Now polling organizations all have liberal biases.

Seriously, get this inane partisan bullshit out of my thread. I'm trying to bring up a major issue.

timmgirvan · #8 10-09-2008, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

This is bad.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27093919/

THIS IS WORSE
http://www.capitalresearch.org/blog/?p=1301

dalakhani · #9 10-09-2008, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

THIS IS WORSE
http://www.capitalresearch.org/blog/?p=1301

There is nothing you can rely on to be more factually accurate than a blog.

So what would that make a blog that cites the New York Post?

Way to go Timmi! We will show them.

Foxnews polls are Rigged for the liberals!!!!

Danzig · #10 10-09-2008, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

THIS IS WORSE
http://www.capitalresearch.org/blog/?p=1301

how is that worse than having a registered voter be denied his right to vote? you're comparing two completely different things. your post serves nothing, as i'd imagine that an equally damning article on an investigation could be found on mccain. dogs chasing their tails, while fundamental rights are taken away from american citizens.

Mortimer · #11 10-09-2008, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

how is that worse than having a registered voter be denied his right to vote? you're comparing two completely different things. your post serves nothing, as i'd imagine that an equally damning article on an investigation could be found on mccain. dogs chasing their tails, while fundamental rights are taken away from american citizens.

^^^^

timmgirvan · #12 10-09-2008, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

how is that worse than having a registered voter be denied his right to vote? you're comparing two completely different things. your post serves nothing, as i'd imagine that an equally damning article on an investigation could be found on mccain. dogs chasing their tails, while fundamental rights are taken away from american citizens.

correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ents-to-acorn/

you can't tell me that you approve of these thing.

Danzig · #13 10-09-2008, 11:15 PM

did you read the article? it has to do with certain states not following the law about removing voters from rolls. didn't mention the # of voters, how they compare to the population as a whole. has a lot to do with people having moved, and not having all their paperwork completely up to date for one--so, the state sees something doesn't tally with the ss paperwork, and off you go. probably has a lot to do with people updating their SS stuff(so as not to affect getting their federal tax return for example, as we all know you must give a proper physical address) while remaining in their home state, and their drivers license shows their old addy. after all, who updates their DL when they move in state? probably not many folks, i'd imagine they wait til the thing expires to avoid an extra fee.
the article doesn't discuss possible improper registration, but illegal removal of voters. BIG difference.

hi_im_god · #14 10-09-2008, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion!

dead. brain dead. what's the real difference?

it's pretty elitist to think a dead person can't vote but a junior high drop out can.

and i hate the idea that american muslims might participate in mainstream politics. we're much better off keeping them marginalized.

i wonder if some smart republican will ever figure out that a culture built around the family might be their natural constituency if you stopped dumbfu<k yahoo's from driving them the other direction.

Danzig · #15 10-09-2008, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

dead. brain dead. what's the real difference?

it's pretty elitist to think a dead person can't vote but a junior high drop out can.

and i hate the idea that american muslims might participate in mainstream politics. we're much better off keeping them marginalized.

i wonder if some smart republican will ever figure out that a culture built around the family might be their natural constituency if you stopped dumbfu<k yahoo's from driving them the other direction.

i missed his 'dems driving folks to mosques' line the first time i read his post...yikes.

i don't know what to say. what, folks who worship in mosques have lost their right to register? i didn't know that.
but you know...had the founding fathers realized just how much trouble we'd have from muslim americans, no doubt there'd be something in the constitution about everyone but them having religious freedom. no doubt about it.

SniperSB23 · #16 10-10-2008, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ents-to-acorn/

you can't tell me that you approve of these thing.

Who cares how many times someone registers? It is how many times they vote that is the issue. If registering 15 times allows them to vote 15 times then it is a major issue. If they can still only vote once then who the hell cares?

timmgirvan · #17 10-10-2008, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Who cares how many times someone registers? It is how many times they vote that is the issue. If registering 15 times allows them to vote 15 times then it is a major issue. If they can still only vote once then who the hell cares?

Of course it's a big issue......why would they register that many times if they weren't planning to abuse the system? Like I tried to point out, there major investigations in 10 states now about this abuse.