|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Easily the best article written on synthetic surfaces
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The prose was really inspired.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Seems the issue to me is climate, as Keeneland seems to be doing well (which 95% of the time has temperate, mild & relatively dry climates during their two meets- in fact, similar to the UK where synthetics have been generally successful), whereas Turfway and Santa Anita have been HORRIBLE in extreme climates. Rip them all out and go back to dirt.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
from the SA pro ride thread ...
according to tbredtimes 1,500 train over the main SA track every morning. "Some of you must have a case of amnesia," said trainer David Hoffmans, an advocate of synthetic surfaces, referring to all the fatalities and injuries on dirt. http://thoroughbredtimes.com/nationa...c-surface.aspx
__________________
http://www.speakupforhorses.org/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That's just about fatalities too. From what I'm reading, the nature of commonly occurring injuries has changed, but overall there are just as many, if not more. If you want to talk about the practicality of the stuff, then forget it. Synthetic loses hands down to dirt. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Turfway is really the only track that needs to be synthetic. They just had too many cancellations previously with their old regular dirt track. But California was foolish to mandate synthetic surfaces. Arlington did it in response to media criticism over breakdowns, and Kee is partners with Martin Collins. Woodbine is probably in a similar situation to TP, in regards to weather.....but I think it will be awhile before you see any other tracks going synthetic.
|