Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:05 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default Cash for Clunkers Success

Top ten models sold

1: Ford Focus

2: Toyota Corolla

3: Honda Civic

4: Toyota Prius

5: Toyota Camry

6: Ford Escape

7: Hyundai Elantra

8: Dodge Caliber

9: Honda Fit

10: Chevrolet Cobalt

[via CNN Money]

So the program is a success? How? We spent billions to bail out GM and they have one model on the list ranked 10th. We then spend $3 billion to increase sales and Toyota and Honda dominate. Those people who were in the market for a new car no longer are and won't be for at least 5 years. But then the top ten clunkers turned in are ALL American made and of course means less service work for American dealers. Then the clunkers turned in are handed over at least in Chicago to mob controlled outfits to be parted out and scraped. So where's the success? Riot?

Ford F-Series
Ford Explorer
Chevrolet C/K/Silverado
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Dodge Ram
Chevrolet Blazer
Jeep Cherokee
Dodge Grand Caravan
Dodge Dakota
Ford Ranger
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:08 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
Top ten models sold

1: Ford Focus

2: Toyota Corolla

3: Honda Civic

4: Toyota Prius

5: Toyota Camry

6: Ford Escape

7: Hyundai Elantra

8: Dodge Caliber

9: Honda Fit

10: Chevrolet Cobalt

[via CNN Money]

So the program is a success? How? We spent billions to bail out GM and they have one model on the list ranked 10th. We then spend $3 billion to increase sales and Toyota and Honda dominate. Those people who were in the market for a new car no longer are and won't be for at least 5 years. But then the top ten clunkers turned in are ALL American made and of course means less service work for American dealers. Then the clunkers turned in are handed over at least in Chicago to mob controlled outfits to be parted out and scraped. So where's the success? Riot?

Ford F-Series
Ford Explorer
Chevrolet C/K/Silverado
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Dodge Ram
Chevrolet Blazer
Jeep Cherokee
Dodge Grand Caravan
Dodge Dakota
Ford Ranger

the govt continues to overstep its bounds with programs like this. again, is the money made from the sales of these cars worth the cost to the american taxpayer? are programs like these paying off in the end? or does it do more harm than good because of the cost incurred? oh, but wait...it's govt money, it's free!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:31 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

>> We spent billions to bail out GM and they have one model on the list >>ranked 10th. We then spend $3 billion to increase sales and Toyota and >>Honda dominate.

Damn the American public on their selection choices! Didn't they know they were supposed to buy only crappy cars that get poor gas mileage, even if those cars didn't qualify for the program?

>> But then the top ten clunkers turned in are ALL American made and of course means less service work for American dealers.

Shocking! Gosh darn it - we are Americans, it is our patriotic duty to continue buying crappy clunkers that cost us tons of money in exorbitant gasoline costs, and break down constantly, just to support the car dealers that sell such crap in the first place!

Americans - give them a little freedom to choose, and look what they do with it.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:40 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
>> We spent billions to bail out GM and they have one model on the list >>ranked 10th. We then spend $3 billion to increase sales and Toyota and >>Honda dominate.

Damn the American public on their selection choices! Didn't they know they were supposed to buy only crappy cars that get poor gas mileage, even if those cars didn't qualify for the program?

>> But then the top ten clunkers turned in are ALL American made and of course means less service work for American dealers.

Shocking! Gosh darn it - we are Americans, it is our patriotic duty to continue buying crappy clunkers that cost us tons of money in exorbitant gasoline costs, and break down constantly, just to support the car dealers that sell such crap in the first place!

Americans - give them a little freedom to choose, and look what they do with it.
Look I'm not faulting the American public at all just this insanely stupid plan. By the way I drive a Hyundai 4WD Sportage and love it. My point is this plan backfired big time!!!
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:52 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
Look I'm not faulting the American public at all just this insanely stupid plan. By the way I drive a Hyundai 4WD Sportage and love it. My point is this plan backfired big time!!!
Backfired big time? How? You didn't even support GM and buy a GM car! How the hell do you think GM got to needing a bailout - due to people like you that bought FOREIGN over AMERICAN!

__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:08 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Backfired big time? How? You didn't even support GM and buy a GM car! How the hell do you think GM got to needing a bailout - due to people like you that bought FOREIGN over AMERICAN!

You answered the question yourself. GM needed a bailout because they make inferior cars and trucks or crap as you put it. People like me don't like crap. So the President using 'our' money bails out the company making crap, then comes up with a plan to help sell more cars and their competition gets more than the lion's share of 'our' money. GM loses twice both in service work and sales which may have gone to them if a $4500 incentive wasn't there to buy a more expensive Honda or Toyota. Cause some people will buy crap if it's the only thing they can afford.

One point that is missed in all of this are the charitable companies that take 'clunkers' in for a donation, (tax deduction) fix them up and provide them back to people who can't afford a new car with the money made going to charitable causes. It's really not that hard to understand now is it?

Maybe I'm forgetting the hole Hope thing as in you buy a piece of crap and Hope it doesn't break down.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:50 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
GM loses twice both in service work and sales which may have gone to them if a $4500 incentive wasn't there to buy a more expensive Honda or Toyota. Cause some people will buy crap if it's the only thing they can afford..
So your position is that people should be forced to buy crap?

You should be comforted that the socialist takeover of of the auto companies by our government will result in cars that are fuel-efficient and that sell.

Cash for Clunkers is a resounding success. Car dealers have had their best quarters in years. They are running out of new cars - thus the manufacturers have to gear up production. That creates and keeps jobs (the Taurus is coming back, btw) and spreads throughout all the manufacturing and ancillary segments that supports the auto industry (railroad and OTR transport, plastic companies, steel companies, etc)

Crappy old cars that don't get good gas mileage and cost people alot in repairs (you pointed that out) are off the road in favor of new, more mileage-efficient cars that put more money in the pockets of people that own them, year after year, in lowered gas and repair costs.

I see no reason to get angry, as you did, about people buying cars that will break down less, and cost their owners less money as a result. Gives people alot more money in their pockets to spend and help the economy recover.

And those cars are manufactured in the US, thus providing jobs, jobs, jobs.

And as Scuds pointed out, and a major goal of the clunkers program, was that we use less oil as a country, a very good thing, keeps us less dependent upon foreign oil and keeps the cost down by keeping demand down.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:01 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
Look I'm not faulting the American public at all just this insanely stupid plan. By the way I drive a Hyundai 4WD Sportage and love it. My point is this plan backfired big time!!!
Any possible way to cut down on the amount of gasoline used by Americans is a big success. Right away, these people will be giving less money to the Muslim Scum that fund terror groups. That $5-$10/ tank of gas (that will be left in their wallets) will be spent on something other than paying Muslim Scum in white robes. It's brilliant, and I am not surprised that many Americans are too dense to see it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:08 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Any possible way to cut down on the amount of gasoline used by Americans is a big success. Right away, these people will be giving less money to the Muslim Scum that fund terror groups. That $5-$10/ tank of gas (that will be left in their wallets) will be spent on something other than paying Muslim Scum in white robes. It's brilliant, and I am not surprised that many Americans are too dense to see it.

the car companies should have offered the incentive-they could have afforded to do that with their bailout money. now, the govt bails them out, and then offers a rebate on top of it. twice the help at twice the price.

but you're right, anything that takes $ away from those who want to commit acts of terror is a good thing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:35 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
the car companies should have offered the incentive-they could have afforded to do that with their bailout money. now, the govt bails them out, and then offers a rebate on top of it. twice the help at twice the price.

but you're right, anything that takes $ away from those who want to commit acts of terror is a good thing.
Well, even if it's done this way, it's still brilliant. Take a 15 mpg car off the road, and replace it with a 25 mpg car. Use 30,000 miles/year, and say $3.50 a gallon for gas. See what happens in 4 years of use. That's over $10k that will be available to be put back into the economy. Even if it's only the clunker discount amount that is returned into the economy, it's still 5k being kept away from terrorist-supporting Muslims. It's a no-brainer. Muhammad is up there in a full-diaper rage. How dare you cut down on the money the non-believers have to give his loyal followers. It's an outrage.



30,000miles/ 25mpg =[1200gallons] x $3.50/gallon=[$4200/year] x 4years =$16.8k

30,000/15 = [2000] x $3.50=$7000 x 4= $28k

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 08-09-2009 at 03:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:41 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
the car companies should have offered the incentive-they could have afforded to do that with their bailout money. now, the govt bails them out, and then offers a rebate on top of it. twice the help at twice the price.

but you're right, anything that takes $ away from those who want to commit acts of terror is a good thing.
??? The bailout money went for bills owed, to keep those companies out of bankruptcy.

It wasn't extra money given to offer customers rebates.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-09-2009, 07:14 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Any possible way to cut down on the amount of gasoline used by Americans is a big success. Right away, these people will be giving less money to the Muslim Scum that fund terror groups. That $5-$10/ tank of gas (that will be left in their wallets) will be spent on something other than paying Muslim Scum in white robes. It's brilliant, and I am not surprised that many Americans are too dense to see it.
Do you believe it will cut down the amount? If so, I've got a bridge I'll sell ya.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-10-2009, 12:08 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Do you believe it will cut down the amount? If so, I've got a bridge I'll sell ya.

Anyone else think it won't play a part in reducing the amount of gas used by Americans? Join coach's club of f'n brilliance.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:47 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
>>, just to support the car dealers that sell such crap in the first place!
Americans - give them a little freedom to choose, and look what they do with it.
No this Administration did that. The average Joe six pack is far wiser than to be buying crap.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-09-2009, 02:55 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
No this Administration did that. The average Joe six pack is far wiser than to be buying crap.
Yeah, and you're getting really angry over the average Joe sixpack doing exactly that, posting the cars they DID buy

So if you and average Joe sixpack are far wiser than to be buying crappy cars, how is this plan a failure, based upon what YOU posted about why it was a failure?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-09-2009, 03:09 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Yeah, and you're getting really angry over the average Joe sixpack doing exactly that, posting the cars they DID buy

So if you and average Joe sixpack are far wiser than to be buying crappy cars, how is this plan a failure, based upon what YOU posted about why it was a failure?
see my last post
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-10-2009, 02:24 AM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dellinger63
So where's the success?
OMG. O.K...Look at the mpg these most being traded in are getting:

Ford F-Series
Ford Explorer
Chevrolet C/K/Silverado
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Dodge Ram
Chevrolet Blazer
Jeep Cherokee
Dodge Grand Caravan
Dodge Dakota
Ford Ranger

Now how many mpg are the following getting?

1: Ford Focus
2: Toyota Corolla
3: Honda Civic
4: Toyota Prius
5: Toyota Camry
6: Ford Escape
7: Hyundai Elantra
8: Dodge Caliber
9: Honda Fit
10: Chevrolet Cobalt

Seriously? You're asking where the savings is? Gas, sir. A lot of it. That's a Government program that's working nicely to save gas. It maybe the smartest American Government program ever. Giving people an incentive to trade in gas guzzlers, and buy gas savers? Yea, it's a total no-brainer. Somebody was thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-10-2009, 11:03 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
OMG. O.K...Look at the mpg these most being traded in are getting:

Ford F-Series
Ford Explorer
Chevrolet C/K/Silverado
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Dodge Ram
Chevrolet Blazer
Jeep Cherokee
Dodge Grand Caravan
Dodge Dakota
Ford Ranger

Now how many mpg are the following getting?

1: Ford Focus
2: Toyota Corolla
3: Honda Civic
4: Toyota Prius
5: Toyota Camry
6: Ford Escape
7: Hyundai Elantra
8: Dodge Caliber
9: Honda Fit
10: Chevrolet Cobalt

Seriously? You're asking where the savings is? Gas, sir. A lot of it. That's a Government program that's working nicely to save gas. It maybe the smartest American Government program ever. Giving people an incentive to trade in gas guzzlers, and buy gas savers? Yea, it's a total no-brainer. Somebody was thinking.
Yeah except now people with the new cars will drive them more!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-10-2009, 02:45 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Yeah except now people with the new cars will drive them more!

Sure...Brilliance indeed...They are all gunna pleasure drive the gas savings away...If you can't come up with a good argument, just sell a foolish one. They will buy anything in here (if you appear confident.)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-10-2009, 03:10 PM
dellinger63's Avatar
dellinger63 dellinger63 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
Sure...Brilliance indeed...They are all gunna pleasure drive the gas savings away...If you can't come up with a good argument, just sell a foolish one. They will buy anything in here (if you appear confident.)
yea like the dems thinking the following is possitive proof the economy is improving

Bailouts for financial firms and billions in tax revenue lost because of the recession drove the deficit to a record $1.3 trillion in July, according to the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Tax receipts that have fallen due to the poor economy and increased spending to save car companies, banks and mortgage firms were major contributors to the federal deficit, according to CBO, which provides official budget numbers for Congress. The federal deficit grew by another $181 billion in July.

Spending through July of 2009 has increased by $530 billion, which is 21 percent over the same period in 2008. The bailout money for banks, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae accounted for almost half of the spending increase. Unemployment benefits have more than doubled, Medicaid spending has grown by a quarter and Medicare spending has increased by 11 percent.

Tax revenue for the first three quarters of 2009 has fallen by approximately $350 billion, or 17 percent compared to the same period last year, due mostly to the effects of the recession on payroll, income and corporate taxes. A third of the decline is due to tax breaks in the stimulus, including the middle-class tax cut that President Obama campaigned on during last year's election.

The independent budget scorekeeper has projected the deficit to reach $1.8 trillion by the end of the fiscal year, Sept. 30. The deficit in 2008 reached $455 billion, which was a record at the time.


is the goal to increase the deficit cause if it is they're doing a heck of a job?

Beating the previous record set by Bush by 395% is something to be proud of and we haven't even seen the effect this healthcare bill and cap and trade will be. Maybe the goal is 1000%.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.