Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2009, 09:36 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default Patriots/Colts





Is this a matter of the Patriots getting better again or have the COLTS lost their window of opportunity?

Sure does seem that this game is close to a blowout if this trend continues....What trend you say?

Answer: Pats passing game has too many guys playing like "All Pro" type receivers that can making a secondary look old awfully fast.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2009, 09:38 PM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docicu3



Is this a matter of the Patriots getting better again or have the COLTS lost their window of opportunity?

Sure does seem like this is close to a blowout if this trend continues....What trend you say?

Answer: Pats passing game has too many All Pro type receivers that can make a secondary look old awfully fast.

aren't the colts missing 3 def starters today?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2009, 09:59 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678
aren't the colts missing 3 def starters today?

Injuries certainly color achievement but all teams have them. The Pats have mixed in some youth on defense that seems to be changing their core....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2009, 10:23 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

The results of this game aside, The colts have yet to groom a tailback or a receiver opposite Wayne that can consistently make plays. Offensively, they can be stopped for periods of time where as in the middle of the decade, it took superhuman defensive efforts to slow them down.

Interestingly, the colts have a defense that no longer relies on Bob Sanders. You take away a couple of big plays to Moss and the Indy defense didnt play poorly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2009, 10:58 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
The results of this game aside, The colts have yet to groom a tailback or a receiver opposite Wayne that can consistently make plays. Offensively, they can be stopped for periods of time where as in the middle of the decade, it took superhuman defensive efforts to slow them down.

Interestingly, the colts have a defense that no longer relies on Bob Sanders. You take away a couple of big plays to Moss and the Indy defense didnt play poorly.
What defines not playing poorly...

3rd quarter stats...

NE

Rushing Yards 105

Passing yards 315

Colts

Rushing Yards 40

Passing Yards 208

Not counting the long punt return of 70 yards......of yeah a 3rd TD by Moss.

I don't know man the Patriots seemed to have bitch slapped the Colts tonight. There's still a quarter to play but 31 points in 3 quarters with a TD thrown away by the fumble 5 minutes ago seems to demonstrate total control.....I would have to ask what would you like to see to demonstrate domination??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:03 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docicu3
What defines not playing poorly...

3rd quarter stats...

NE

Rushing Yards 105

Passing yards 315

Colts

Rushing Yards 40

Passing Yards 208

Not counting the long punt return of 70 yards......of yeah a 3rd TD by Moss.

I don't know man the Patriots seemed to have bitch slapped the Colts tonight. There's still a quarter to play but 31 points in 3 quarters with a TD thrown away by the fumble 5 minutes ago seems to demonstrate total control.....I would have to ask what would you like to see to demonstrate domination??
I wrote that at half time. I take it back. New England is killing them.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:22 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think we're watching two Super Bowl contenders. I'd take the Steelers even though they lost today.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:36 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
I don't think we're watching two Super Bowl contenders. I'd take the Steelers even though they lost today.
I keep waiting for the ravens to get on a roll.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:36 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

What a strange game? Dominant to dummies in minutes....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:40 PM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docicu3
What a strange game? Dominant to dummies in minutes....


Crinkle Crinkle trash can..........thump!!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:40 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docicu3
What a strange game? Dominant to dummies in minutes....
wow...belichick will certainly get it for that end game.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:46 PM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahaha. Etc.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:46 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guessing signals isn't as fun.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:49 PM
rpncaine's Avatar
rpncaine rpncaine is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,233
Default

Belichick was a genius tonight!
__________________
“Once there was only dark. If you ask me, light’s winning.”–Rust Cohle – True Detective
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:53 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

That was a pretty bad call on the spot, but the Patriots blew it by wasting their time outs and not being able to challenge. Also, if that is the best play you have on 4th and 2, you should probably punt.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-16-2009, 01:02 AM
dagolfer33's Avatar
dagolfer33 dagolfer33 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,524
Default

That must have been an intentional strategic loss on Belichick's part. Maybe trying to set them up for later. Or, that was just stupidity.
__________________
"Let the whiners and lazy cry about how impossible "they've" made it to win at this game." - Steve Byk
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-16-2009, 08:56 AM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dagolfer33
That must have been an intentional strategic loss on Belichick's part. Maybe trying to set them up for later. Or, that was just stupidity.

maybe he knows his defense stinks
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-16-2009, 09:00 AM
docicu3 docicu3 is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,778
Default

[quote=dagolfer33That must have been an intentional strategic loss on Belichick's part. Maybe trying to set them up for later. Or, that was just stupidity.[/QUOTE]


This went through my mind as well but the way BB looked at the press conference was like he just got caught with his pants on his ankles......WEEI in Boston will be classic today.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.