Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Charles Hatton Reading Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2009, 04:27 PM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,435
Default SYMPOSIUM: Betfair exec.. "Exchange format is U.S. future"

Betfair lobbies for U.S. allies
By Matt Hegarty

http://www.drf.com/news/article/109426.html

TUCSON, Ariz. - The world of entertainment has changed rapidly in the last 15 years, and the racing industry will need to adopt new betting models to compete or face a slow death, the chief executive of the British bet-matching company Betfair told the racing industry during Tuesday's opening session of the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing and Gaming here.

Gerard Cunningham, the U.S. representative for Betfair, said that younger generations have grown up in a world in which data-rich entertainment options and social networks are de rigueur, a dynamic that he said threatened racing's current business model. In addition, Cunningham said, other gambling options such as slot machines and poker give bettors a bigger bang for the buck, allowing those games to steal market share from racing by merely tapping bettors out over a longer haul.

Cunningham then invited racing industry officials to meet with him to discuss the legalization of betting exchanges, a type of market-based betting pioneered by Betfair that allows customers to bet against each other. Betting exchanges are illegal in the U.S. because the government believes that they allow customers to act as bookmakers.

"My concern is that if we don't do this, I don't know what the future looks like for us in racing," Cunningham said.

The comments underlined Betfair's efforts to ally the U.S. racing industry to its cause so that it can go hand-in-hand with horsemen and racetracks to lobby for the legalization of betting exchanges. Earlier this year, as part of that effort, Betfair purchased the account-wagering company TVG, giving the company a U.S. foothold for its operations.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2009, 04:32 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Steve, how do you feel about betting exchanges. I used to do quite well on IBETX laying against odds on favorites and getting juicy odds when going long a horse. Having said this , it is wide open for corruption as it is very easy to make a horse lose.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2009, 04:39 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Please legalize this so I can offer the RockHardTens of the world healthy odds on Zensational in the Sprint.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2009, 04:55 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
Please legalize this so I can offer the RockHardTens of the world healthy odds on Zensational in the Sprint.
From my expierence when laying against non odds on horses you need to offer at least 1.5 times track odds to get hit. For longer shots much much more. 1 loss wipes out a whole lot of wins.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2009, 07:35 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
Steve, how do you feel about betting exchanges. I used to do quite well on IBETX laying against odds on favorites and getting juicy odds when going long a horse. Having said this , it is wide open for corruption as it is very easy to make a horse lose.
I don't have enough understanding of the concept to fairly judge as I didn't get involved when it was out there initially. I know it's too successful to ignore, and if it can be formulated to allow tracks/horsemen to share in the handle, it has the potential to entice a new generation of player and be vital to whatever is ahead in North American racing. But if it only siphons action out of the pari-mutuel pool, it's a problem.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2009, 08:26 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Simply put, it would lower the takeout which would attract more gambling money....Horse racing needs to compete with sports gambling.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2009, 08:42 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
Simply put, it would lower the takeout which would attract more gambling money....Horse racing needs to compete with sports gambling.
The lowering of takeout is a bit of a canard though Rand... It absolutely can stand to come down of course to a level that's 'right' and stimulates handle to the point that offsets the decrease. There's numbers that make sense for everyone and are simply necessary to pay for the overheads of everything involved in putting on the show.

But more than takeout, the nature of the internal model demands adjustment. As has been discussed widelt in the "model is upside down" discussions, the bet-takers are getting too much... The source of the product deserves an increase in the share.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-10-2009, 08:44 AM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
The lowering of takeout is a bit of a canard though Rand... It absolutely can stand to come down of course to a level that's 'right' and stimulates handle to the point that offsets the decrease. There's numbers that make sense for everyone and are simply necessary to pay for the overheads of everything involved in putting on the show.

But more than takeout, the nature of the internal model demands adjustment. As has been discussed widelt in the "model is upside down" discussions, the bet-takers are getting too much... The source of the product deserves an increase in the share.
10% on WPS should be a start just like sports betting. Breakage needs to be reassessed as well. I don't think its a canard. Bigger dollar players would play horses if they perceived it more as a beatable game than a hobby.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.