|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
7/17 (BEL): Jaipur S. (G3)
9th (5:16) Jaipur S. (G3)
6 Furlongs (Inner Turf) | Open | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $200,000 1 Yield Bogey Samyn J L 118 L 2 Dubai Rainbow Hill C 118 L 3 Escrow Kid Santiago V 113 L 4 Stradivinsky Lopez C C 118 L 5 Formidable Lezcano J 118 L 6 Our Friend Harvey Bridgmohan S X 118 L 7 Perfect Officer Cohen D 118 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Hard to believe that this race doesnt draw more entries. Always one of my favorite races.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
After looking at the size of the fields of the other races posted...wow. This is like an overflow field!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck, as a trainer why do you think connections don't take more chances in stakes? I know it's a multi layered question. But take a look at the sticky threads from today. The only stake that drew a somewhat full field was the turf stake at Delaware. I know there aren't many good horses out there. But with the gap closing in between "good" horses and mediocre, how come more people aren't taking chances in these races?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder why Chad Brown didn't send Silver Timber here. . . Maybe a (bogus) distance issue.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
He ran 3 days ago @ MTH. Probably too much to ask coming back in 6 days.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I know. . . I'm wondering why he didn't go here instead.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The horse ran either last weekend or the the weekend before., at MTH.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I Know
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not positive but he may have run recently at Monmouth...
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think he just ran second at Monmouth. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone know why Silver Timber isn't in here?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In the East there is little attempt at coordination of stakes which leads to overlapping spots especially in the 3 yo turf division when Colonials races are added in. I know i sound like a broken record but 10-15 years ago the NYRA stakes not only carried much more prestige but the purse levels were a lot higher for the most part. That isn't true anymore. But that only explains the legitimate or semi legitimate stakes horses. I believe that a big reason we see so few horses taking shots in these stakes that a handful of trainers control so much of the talent. Sure they may have a runner in one of these races but they may also have 2 or 3 in the barn that maybe wouldn't be one of the top choices but deserve a chance, especially in the unusual distance races like the 1 1/2 race. The higher purse levels at Monmouth could be a factor too. An owner or trainer may choose to be 2-1 in an 85k allowance race as opposed to being 6 or 7-1 in a 200k stake. Win percentage and some trainers obsession with it Being that you can scratch without reason up to 45 minutes before post in a stake it makes me wonder why guys dont simply nominate and enter and take a look at these races. It isnt like this is a new trend. |