|
|
 |
|
|
|
#2
10-18-2010, 02:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Woodcock
|
|
#3
10-18-2010, 03:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
New England Patriots - Bestest athlete in the history of the world evah = No possible way that they could be better.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#4
10-18-2010, 03:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doug will have a color coded chart showing otherwise with a ROI in italics.
|
|
#5
10-18-2010, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
10-18-2010, 05:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No Bellicheat is 8-0 or a little better after the Bye week. Same as Andy Reid. Great coaches that get an extra week to watch film produce. Pats are a good bet for sure following a bye.
|
|
#7
10-18-2010, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
10-18-2010, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Reid usually puts together an excellent 15 play game plan to start the game. After that... its all up in the air. He might be the scariest guy in the NFL with a challenge flag or time out.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#9
10-21-2010, 01:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Pats were favored by a field goal - and clawed their way back from 10 points down in the 4th quarter to force OT. They won late enough in OT that if they missed the kick the game would have probably ended a tie. They stomped the Ravens in the regular season last year and got smoked in the playoffs when everyone was hurt. The Ravens were "flying blind" in that they had no idea what the Pats would try to do and how to game plan for them. They played classic Ravens style defense - and kept a deep safety back in centerfield like they always do (Idiotic now that the Pats have no deep threat) - and they dialed up some of there exotic blitzes like they always do (stupid as hell, why blitz Brady when he holds onto the ball for like a half a second? At least when Moss was there he held it longer and had to step into his throws) The Pats were rated the #1 team in the NFL by that fancy stats site coming into the game .. now that they've put film on tape and showed their hand offensively .. they lose that element. I realize the Chargers have lost to the St. Louis Rams and Oakland Raiders in back to back weeks ... I realize the Chargers have just lost their best offensive player Antonio Gates to an injury. They MURDER the Patriots this week though. This is the game you bet against the Pats. On the road, after a hard fought come from behind win, after exposing the new look offense, and facing a team that everyone is down on. You don't bet against them at home, off a bye week, in a revenge game, with the opposing defense flying blind and having no certainty as to what they might see. Chargers 27 Pats 13
|
|
#11
10-21-2010, 02:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll take the team that just got disposed of by the freaking sad Raiders and the sad Rams in back to back weeks .. and just lost their best offensive player to injury. Go to a sports bar ... ask anyone you see Pats (-3.5) against the Chargers - 98% of the people will tell you the Pats are the bet. You can tell all of them "that's a real good opinion" The Patriots are now dink and dunk. The defense doesn't show up on the road. I don't know a god damned thing about the Chargers ... but I'd take any team with half a pulse over the Pats right now. As much as you may think - I'm not saying this to lure you past confliction and into cheering the Pats on - this isn't some devious ploy of mine. I really think the Pats will be exposed now that they've put that film on tape. I know absolutely nothing about like 30.5 of the 32 teams in the NFL. I do know the Pats.
|
|
#12
10-18-2010, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
