![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() "We don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."
![]() http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...publicans-sit/
__________________
We've Gone Delirious Last edited by geeker2 : 10-26-2010 at 10:19 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Apparently it's only "racist" on Faux News and Stormfront.org, and only recently.
Everywhere else, it's been his standard stump speech for a while now: Quote:
OMG, that's so "racist" ! ![]()
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There... that was more realistic.
__________________
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() High speed rail service between Chicago and Iowa?
It's them...right? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
When the Democrats lose as badly as predicted next Tuesday, we'll have a commentator respond to the president's statement by paraphrasing it thus: "Well, it would appear that the president and his party will be legislatively sitting in the back." If there is a reaction of that statement being racist, then the original statement by the president must be equally so. If there is no reaction, then maybe the press has grown up a little bit. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't think Obama is a racist. He is just an awful President is all. Which is a lot more important than whether he dislikes any group of people.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I know you have been speaking of "The Republican Tsunami" since Obama got in office, but have you actually been reading any of the more accurate poll predictions? (like fivethirtyeight.com)
The narrative during last August was the GOP was supposed to sweep into the Senate and House, taking over both easily. Yet the GOP has managed to definitively lose control of the Senate due to the more extreme Tea Party candidates (defeating the moderate GOP candidate) turning voters back to the Dems (less than 10% chance of winning the Senate now). And in the House, instead of winning 40-50 excess seats easily in a "tsunami", the GOP will probably only barely get the minimal 20 -30 seats (they will be in control). That's nothing. That's what the opposite party normally gets in every first midterm election post-presidential election. The other thing is that the House has never turned without the Senate. Appears it could happen this year. We'll see, but I think you'd better look at some polling numbers, Joey, rather than reading right wing web blogs filled with hope.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Tonight’s House Forecast: 52-Seat Gain For G.O.P.
(headline from fivethirtyeight.com)
__________________
We've Gone Delirious |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Be fair..they were empty anyways.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yikes. It should have been far larger, according to the freaks at the town halls a year ago August.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well look at it this way Riot...it was a good run while it lasted. I am sure Sarah Louise and the Tea Party can find room for you !!
__________________
We've Gone Delirious |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Are you really trying to spin losing the house into some sort of victory for the Dems? Are you?
|