![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() will you play it ?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() No way. Starve the beast. They raised takeout in all of Cali. I refuse to play there again.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If we get more than a steady diet of 5 horse fields I'll play
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Eventually I will, but so many of those horses out there have been running on the fake stuff for so long, that I might be inclined to watch for a month. It will be interesting to see any type of trends between the poly horses versus horses shipping in. Also those horses that reversed their form at the Fairplex and then regressed back at Hollywood might require a second look.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1.) The new levels are still extremely competitive with the nationwide average. 2.) The increased takeout will enable them to increase purses and make a last ditch effort to revitalize CA racing, which is headed down a dark and lonely path. Contrary to what HANA may lead you to believe, takeout decreases are not the panacea of racing. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Overnight purses are going up 25% and its not because Uncle Frank is printing money in ze money room.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Let's see at the end of the meet where things are. Handle etc...
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Double facepalm. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() impressive.......panacea & canard, in a thread without steve's input.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At the very least, the increased purses at the beginning of the meet have attracted Steve Asmussen to go out there for the first time and for trainers that left like Eric Guillot to return. Those guys have the horsepower to help a meet simply because of their numbers and the variety of horses they have. The assumption that increased handle will enable them to sustain those purse levels is hardly a crazy one.
I'm interested to know why you think decreasing takeout will lead to some great revival of racing. Exchange wagering has a significantly better chance to help turn things around. Going from 20.68% on exotics to 22.68% while leaving the WPS takeout the same is going to make a difference for CA racing. The CA racing model is completely broken. Trying to survive with meets like what they're offering at Hollywood is never going to work. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I'd believe in Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny before I believe the powers that be have enough of a clue to not screw up exchange wagering. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And here I always thought I was bred because my parents were horny. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm gonna play the crap out of it. There's going to be opportunity while everyone figures it out. This was one of my favorite tracks pre-poly. Take-out only matters when you win!
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() what is exchange wagering?
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's when PG1985 makes a wager. He exchanges his money for nothing in return.
|