Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2011, 10:14 PM
my miss storm cat's Avatar
my miss storm cat my miss storm cat is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,025
Default The other winning streak

A tiny story about a little horse at a small racetrack.

Dr. Seuss once wrote "a person's a person no matter how small".

The same can be said for Hayley... especially before anyone turns this into something it is not.

It's a nice win record for a local Zia Park girl... no one is calling her the next Citation.

http://www.drf.com/news/zia-park-hay...a-park-distaff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2011, 11:20 AM
my miss storm cat's Avatar
my miss storm cat my miss storm cat is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,025
Default

... and another small winning streak for an even smaller name...

Six in a row for Ted's Folly...

http://www.drf.com/news/remington-te...raight-victory
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2011, 11:37 AM
cal828 cal828 is offline
Havre de Grace
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by my miss storm cat View Post
... and another small winning streak for an even smaller name...

Six in a row for Ted's Folly...

http://www.drf.com/news/remington-te...raight-victory
Caleb's Posse came out of that race last year. And then went on to Oaklawn. He beat me every time he ran. If I bet him, he lost. If I bet against him, he won. Finally able to bet him right in King's Bishop. Not sure where Ted's Folly's connections are taking him, but maybe I'll get see him at Oaklawn. Maybe he'll spare me some of the anguish that Caleb's posse gave me, but where's the fun in that?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:14 PM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 43,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by my miss storm cat View Post
... and another small winning streak for an even smaller name...

Six in a row for Ted's Folly...

http://www.drf.com/news/remington-te...raight-victory
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal828 View Post
Caleb's Posse came out of that race last year. And then went on to Oaklawn. He beat me every time he ran. If I bet him, he lost. If I bet against him, he won. Finally able to bet him right in King's Bishop. Not sure where Ted's Folly's connections are taking him, but maybe I'll get see him at Oaklawn. Maybe he'll spare me some of the anguish that Caleb's posse gave me, but where's the fun in that?
Had trainer Wilson Brown on ATR this morning and he was terrific. Forgot that he trained It'sallinthechase!
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2011, 11:38 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Shouldn't Awesome Feather get a mention?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:00 PM
RolloTomasi's Avatar
RolloTomasi RolloTomasi is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Shouldn't Awesome Feather get a mention?
I think Star Guitar has won 7 in a row, too.

He should be close to the modern day, contemporary, for all time, post-Civil War, Southern United States, Louisiana-bred win record by now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:09 PM
Calzone Lord's Avatar
Calzone Lord Calzone Lord is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,552
Default

When exactly is the start of the "modern era" in horse racing?

I keep hearing the phrase modern era ... but no one seems to define it.

The Daily Racing Form was first published in 1896 ... and all the old past performances and result charts still exist from April 1st 1896 onward at the Keeneland Library. Is that the cut off?

Sir Barton won the first triple crown and Man O' War started racing in 1919 ... is that the cut off?

I can't really think of anything else that would seperate the modern era from the pre modern era.

My best guess would be the start of the modern era in horse racing would be either April 1st 1896 or Jan 1st 1919.

Anyone else with an idea?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:11 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord View Post
When exactly is the start of the "modern era" in horse racing?

I keep hearing the phrase modern era ... but no one seems to define it.

The Daily Racing Form was first published in 1896 ... and all the old past performances and result charts still exist from April 1st 1896 onward at the Keeneland Library. Is that the cut off?

Sir Barton won the first triple crown and Man O' War started racing in 1919 ... is that the cut off?

I can't really think of anything else that would seperate the modern era from the pre modern era.

My best guess would be the start of the modern era in horse racing would be either April 1st 1896 or Jan 1st 1919.

Anyone else with an idea?
Apparently it is whatever makes the best story.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:24 PM
Calzone Lord's Avatar
Calzone Lord Calzone Lord is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Apparently it is whatever makes the best story.
That's pretty much what I've concluded.

Here is what I found regarding the definition of the "modern era" in baseball:


Quote:
By baseball convention the "Modern Era" began in 1900, roughly when the rules and conventions were stabilizing. The American League was founded in that year. It was also the first year where home plate acquired its current pentagon shape.

The strike zone was only defined in 1887, and the four ball walk appeared 2 years later. In 1893 the pitcher's mound was moved to its current location of 60 feet, 6 inches from home plate.

So until very late in the 19th Century, the games rules were undergoing very significant changes, and Major League Baseball thus does not recognize records and statistics compiled in that era to be comparable to the statistics achieved today.

1900 was determined to be a simple, clean date to separate between baseball's formative years, and the game whose rules have been remarkably stable since then.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:30 PM
RolloTomasi's Avatar
RolloTomasi RolloTomasi is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Apparently it is whatever makes the best story.
Holy sh!t, that's what I was trying to say and it took me about a thousand words. Even had to resort to a Zenyatta reference.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:29 PM
RolloTomasi's Avatar
RolloTomasi RolloTomasi is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord View Post
When exactly is the start of the "modern era" in horse racing?

I keep hearing the phrase modern era ... but no one seems to define it.

My best guess would be the start of the modern era in horse racing would be either April 1st 1896 or Jan 1st 1919.

Anyone else with an idea?
As far as the people using "modern era" in conjunction with Rapid Redux's streak, clearly, the modern era started after 1913.

The "modern era" is an idea that remains in flux, usually changing in order to serve the needs of whatever BS the press and the powers that be want to feed us. No one wants to hear about the "second to do this or that". They want to read about the "first". And yet, history always repeats itself. Thus, the modern era always begins just after the point where the subject being discussed was last manifest.

Turf writers want to compare these state-breds and nickel claimers to the great Citation, not some turn-of-the-century plough horse who ran every 3 days until he was a 12 year old. Citation is the go-to stock horse for all their record-chasing needs.

Ironically, I'm not so sure anyone not a die-hard fan (or an octogenarian) would even know who Citation was in this day and age. Recently, I referred to Alysheba and Ferdinand to someone and I got the response, "Before my time". Based on that, the modern era may have rebooted once again, this time with Smarty Jones being the first all-timer. Zenyatta, obviously, the second.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-2011, 02:41 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzone Lord View Post
When exactly is the start of the "modern era" in horse racing?

I keep hearing the phrase modern era ... but no one seems to define it.

The Daily Racing Form was first published in 1896 ... and all the old past performances and result charts still exist from April 1st 1896 onward at the Keeneland Library. Is that the cut off?

Sir Barton won the first triple crown and Man O' War started racing in 1919 ... is that the cut off?

I can't really think of anything else that would seperate the modern era from the pre modern era.

My best guess would be the start of the modern era in horse racing would be either April 1st 1896 or Jan 1st 1919.

Anyone else with an idea?
Yes. When they changed the extant American Thoroughbred bloodstock, by massive European importations. After the Depression. Maybe a little earlier. But starting with the big farms of the 1930's - 1940's, with their Euro imported stallions.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2011, 02:49 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Yes. When they changed the extant American Thoroughbred bloodstock, by massive European importations. After the Depression. Maybe a little earlier. But starting with the big farms of the 1930's - 1940's, with their Euro imported stallions.
Since Man O' War is usually included, along with Sir Barton, I'm not sure that is going to fly.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2011, 03:01 PM
Calzone Lord's Avatar
Calzone Lord Calzone Lord is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Yes. When they changed the extant American Thoroughbred bloodstock, by massive European importations. After the Depression. Maybe a little earlier. But starting with the big farms of the 1930's - 1940's, with their Euro imported stallions.
It's kind of tricky to put an exact date or year to something like that.

The foal crop in 1904 -- right before things started to get bad for racing purse money - was 3,990... and a lot of bloodstock had been imported.

40 years later -- the foal crop was just 5,650 in 1944.

It wasn't really until the 1960's when you started to see a massive production of foals.

I read a few interesting columns a while ago written by Vosburgh about the stock farms in Kentucky during the early 1920's.

He wrote in great detail about the big ones of the day such as Elmendorf Stud, Xalapa, Claibourne, Faraway, Hinata, The Nursery Stud, The Whitney and Idle Hour, Woodburn and Hartland.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:10 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi View Post
I think Star Guitar has won 7 in a row, too.

He should be close to the modern day, contemporary, for all time, post-Civil War, Southern United States, Louisiana-bred win record by now.
You would think so, but you have to exclude females because of Hallowed Dreams. Even so, it is a very prestigious record.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-12-2011, 01:01 PM
my miss storm cat's Avatar
my miss storm cat my miss storm cat is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles View Post
Shouldn't Awesome Feather get a mention?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi View Post
I think Star Guitar has won 7 in a row, too.

He should be close to the modern day, contemporary, for all time, post-Civil War, Southern United States, Louisiana-bred win record by now.
The point of this thread was really for the complete unknowns... the smallest of the small names... I guess I didn't make that clear at all and assumed everyone had esp. Sorry.

RR is a big gun compared to the types I had in mind when I started this but sure we can add the big(ger) names too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept View Post
Had trainer Wilson Brown on ATR this morning and he was terrific. Forgot that he trained It'sallinthechase!
Cool!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cal828 View Post
Caleb's Posse came out of that race last year. And then went on to Oaklawn. He beat me every time he ran. If I bet him, he lost. If I bet against him, he won. Finally able to bet him right in King's Bishop. Not sure where Ted's Folly's connections are taking him, but maybe I'll get see him at Oaklawn. Maybe he'll spare me some of the anguish that Caleb's posse gave me, but where's the fun in that?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-12-2011, 01:11 PM
RolloTomasi's Avatar
RolloTomasi RolloTomasi is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by my miss storm cat View Post
The point of this thread was really for the complete unknowns... the smallest of the small names... I guess I didn't make that clear at all and assumed everyone had esp. Sorry.

RR is a big gun compared to the types I had in mind when I started this but sure we can add the big(ger) names too.
The smallest of the small don't run for $300k and $55k purses. Rapid Redux doesn't run for anything close to that.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-12-2011, 01:13 PM
my miss storm cat's Avatar
my miss storm cat my miss storm cat is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 22,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RolloTomasi View Post
The smallest of the small don't run for $300k and $55k purses. Rapid Redux doesn't run for anything close to that.
Fair enough.

The names... I doubt they're well known but you're right, of course.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.