Should Hillary have been charged in email scandal?

[joeydb]

The FBI has made the announcement: there will be no charges.

The statement also said that there was extremely careless handling of classified information. She put our national security at risk.

What do you guys think?

[casp0555]

probably the same way he thinks....

hires_petraeus3d.jpg
fixed it myself

[mclem0822]

No

[mclem0822]

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/brief...3/email-facts/

[Danzig]

The fbi reccommended no charges. Still up to doj.
But maybe they should investigate eight more times to be sure..

And being careless is not illegal. Laws have to be clearly defined. Unless there was a law on the books at the time she was at state that defined careless emailing, etc, they cannot charge for that.

The six thus far who voted she should have been charged...what should she have been charged with? And what makes you better informed and capable than the fbi??

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by casp0555

probably the same way he thinks....

Attachment 2633
fixed it myself

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

Cuz in the land of the brain dead, any critism of Clinton is automatically support for Trump. Keep it Simple for the Stupid.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by Danzig

Petraus sent classified info to his mistress, who had no clearances. Clinton emailed fellow state employees who did.
Petraus lied to investigstors,whereas there is no info to say clinton did.
So, no real similarities between the two and what happened.
But trump said so, so his followers parrot him without actually looking at the facts. Not even the fact that trump gives opposite opinions to his own proclamations all the time. Not sure how anyone can believe him, he doesnt even believe himself.

Any problem at all with the fact that she kept and deleted emails on a separate sever to purposely avoid FOIA and broke the Federal Records Act? Or just happy that the most corrupt administration in the history of the republic let her walk?

[mclem0822]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Any problem at all with the fact that she kept and deleted emails on a separate sever to purposely avoid FOIA and broke the Federal Records Act? Or just happy that the most corrupt administration in the history of the republic let her walk?

Sorry but this is one thing you cannot blame the BUSH CRIME FAMILY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR, so let's leave them out!

[Danzig]

Harding is one usually mentioned re corruption.

As for bush, mclem....


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/12/bush200712


Clinton had left President Bush in an ideal position to pursue such policies. Remember the presidential debates in 2000 between Al Gore and George Bush, and how the two men argued over how to spend America’s anticipated $2.2 trillion budget surplus? The country could well have afforded to ramp up domestic investment in key areas. In fact, doing so would have staved off recession in the short run while spurring growth in the long run.

But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001. Those with incomes over a million got a tax cut of $18,000—more than 30 times larger than the cut received by the average American.

[bigrun]

Originally Posted by mclem0822

Sorry but this is one thing you cannot blame the BUSH CRIME FAMILY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR, so let's leave them out!

...true story..

[richard burch]

YES..YES..YES..!


but it was never going to happen.