|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-28-2007, 10:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
so much for the myth..ladys cant capp
top 10 at the nhct..3 ladys....wow..
 Last edited by hoovesupsideyourhead : 01-28-2007 at 10:28 AM. 
|
|
#4
01-28-2007, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On the subject of the Handicapping contest there is an extremely interesting letter in today's DRF concerning qualifiers......
Rule change would root out 'shills' I think the NTRA and Daily Racing Form should consider changing the rules for qualifying for the NTRA/DRF National Handicapping Tournament, which went on this past weekend in Vegas. All contests around the country should allow people to enter as many times as they want, and you should be able to win multiple entries to the final tournament. I qualified last year and am now basically sick and tired of seeing people bringing 10 or 15 family members or friends to the track and using them as shills to qualify. One man who has qualified on multiple occasions (and has himself and three or four family members in the finals again this year) routinely brings about 15-20 people to every local tournament around where he resides and none of them ever pick up a Racing Form or a program. They all have headphones on and are usually reading a book or something. Every bet they make is directed by him, and they couldn't answer even a basic horse racing question when asked. It's a totally unfair advantage to be able to cover four or five longshots in a race when you hate the favorite, and if they blow, you still have 10 more bullets to fire. I'm sure many more "shills" exist among friends that aren't as obvious. If the tracks are going to blatantly look the other way, why not just let me enter 15 times myself and save everyone all the headaches. If you don't believe many people in the finals are "owned" by someone else, I've got a bridge to sell you. Rob Clayton Wilmington, Del.
|
|
#5
01-28-2007, 12:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 Seek respect, not attention.
|
|
#6
01-28-2007, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yes he does and this issue needs to be addressed.
|
|
#7
01-28-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
drf letter to the editor story on NHT qualifiers
A very timely letter to the DRF editor . Seems as though gaining entry to NHC tourney isn't quite the level playing field. I've entered a few qualifiers and had noticed more than a few husband/wife (sig other) types before, BUT, I never imagined that someone would have 10-15 family/friends hooked up to headsets and told who to bet in a tourney.
 " Rule change would root out 'shills' " "I think the NTRA and Daily Racing Form should consider changing the rules for qualifying for the NTRA/DRF National Handicapping Tournament, which went on this past weekend in Vegas. All contests around the country should allow people to enter as many times as they want, and you should be able to win multiple entries to the final tournament. I qualified last year and am now basically sick and tired of seeing people bringing 10 or 15 family members or friends to the track and using them as shills to qualify. One man who has qualified on multiple occasions (and has himself and three or four family members in the finals again this year) routinely brings about 15-20 people to every local tournament around where he resides and none of them ever pick up a Racing Form or a program. They all have headphones on and are usually reading a book or something. Every bet they make is directed by him, and they couldn't answer even a basic horse racing question when asked. It's a totally unfair advantage to be able to cover four or five longshots in a race when you hate the favorite, and if they blow, you still have 10 more bullets to fire. I'm sure many more "shills" exist among friends that aren't as obvious. If the tracks are going to blatantly look the other way, why not just let me enter 15 times myself and save everyone all the headaches. If you don't believe many people in the finals are "owned" by someone else, I've got a bridge to sell you. Rob Clayton Wilmington, Del. "
|
how lame to think they can't.
Hybrid Mode
