Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 04-09-2007, 03:56 PM
Honu's Avatar
Honu Honu is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The tracks did cover the jocks for $100000 until they (Guild) let the policy lapse. Plus that amount really isn't enough anymore to cover a serious injury. Most tracks have adequate coverage in place.
We are very lucky that here in Cali it is up to a million and i believe a few other states are at that same level.
__________________

Horses are like strawberries....they can go bad overnight. Charlie Whittingham
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 04-09-2007, 06:03 PM
Merlinsky Merlinsky is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu
I will never change my mind , jocks should have unlimited accident isurance while they are on the job , if they go down and get paralyzed or have severe head injuries they shouldnt have to worry if their medical bills are payed and if they will have enough money to eat on. It should be in the insurance policy and to be honest the racetracks should pay for it .
I read through this thread with interest and was trying to imagine the impact if tracks were the suppliers of an insurance policy. It just seems like things like drug use, actions done to make weight, past exhibited aggression while riding, and previous incidents of injury would be used to determine risk to the track and manipulate jockey participation there. I don't know that we could expect them to merely operate as they have been and pay out when there's an injury--they're gonna want to put their 2 cents in and exert pressure on the jockeys' ability to earn livelihood and perhaps deciding when and where they can ride, as well as when they retire. What about drug tests? Also couldn't they leverage something against overly aggressive jockeys as a way of guarding their investment? We all know not every group of stewards is created equal. Some are going to slap a jockey with some penalty, perhaps they might blame the wrong one or blame nobody when somebody put the lives and careers of other jockeys at risk (and, if we're being cynical, by extension put the track at risk of big payout). Would tracks also be in any way inclined to deal with running horses til they break or issues of unsoundness in general since there's again, additional potential that the jockey would get hurt if a trainer or owner put a risky horse out there. Whole big can of worms and definitely one that needs to be opened. It's just amazing to think of the implications if there are certain approaches taken.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.