#1
|
||||
|
||||
Cutbacks?
Seems like a number of recent winners cutting back from Route to Sprint at Aqueduct.
Any thoughts on what key factors to look for on a playable cutback? Trainer %, projected race flow, previous success at the distance, etc.? I seem to have trouble finding the right ones to play consistently. Thanks |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
The Aqueduct of this year is not the same one we've come to know in the past. I usually play on weekends and an occasional afternoon during the week if I'm telecommuting.
It's been very cold this winter and it seems like the track is very tiring. I think now more than ever it's a good idea to tape the races and watch the replays as there are a lot of times the pp's don't tell the whole story. I've made a few nice scores this winter but there are times that I feel totally clueless playing the inner track. Throat would probably be the best one to answer your question. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Here's an, after the fact, example of what I consider a perfect cutback situation. Today's 5th at PHA.
Bonheur two back, he's sets the pace in a 2turn mile and collapses (in a wipeout) last out, 8.5F, he's chasing the pacesetters, is the only to move early, when they're still strong, and then backs up late, in a race that goes 1-2 around the track today, he had the rail and figured to get a trip behind faster horses early going 7F. He wasn't fast enough to contest early, sat perfectly inside/behind all the way around the track, and got up at the wire. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel Last edited by declansharbor : 02-24-2009 at 05:55 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
post position and start
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|