will pays for oaks/derby

[gales0678]

can anyone post please?

[eajinabi]

Looking for a big pay day tommorow?

[booner]

$1 will pays:

6 with.......
1 - $74
2 - $45
3 - 71
4 - 97
5 - 24
6 - 7
7 - 30
8 - 154
9 - 153
10 - 32
11 - 25
12 - 37
13 - 6
14 - 172
15 - 10
16 - 11
17 - 81
18 - 167
19 - 25
20 - 155

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by eajinabi

Looking for a big pay day tommorow?

no my buddy has the mott horse tomorrow was asking what it paid

[Gander]

Thanks for posting. Predictably, not much better than the horse in the Derby will pay to win.

[randallscott35]

I have a double with Dunkirk....Those odds say FF and IWR will be very close as faves.

[booner]

With the possibly of an off-track tommorrow, it doesn't surprise me. Who other than FF has shown any off-track success?

[eajinabi]

Originally Posted by gales0678

no my buddy has the mott horse tomorrow was asking what it paid

How much did he play?

[kgar311]

If you think about it the double this year was just a way to up the win odds on your horse. Now I have 45-1 on my horse instead of 26-1.

[Gander]

Not much- just a $60 double.

[SniperSB23]

If you like a longshot the Oaks/Derby double is such a better option. You get 154-1 on Mine that Bird with the free space of Rachel in the double pool as opposed to 51-1 in the Derby win pool. Only one I bet was West Side Bernie who seemed value at 74-1.

[Gander]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

If you like a longshot the Oaks/Derby double is such a better option. You get 154-1 on Mine that Bird with the free space of Rachel in the double pool as opposed to 51-1 in the Derby win pool. Only one I bet was West Side Bernie who seemed value at 74-1.

Except with the case of Friesan Fires, whose double was coming back $11.40 as opposed to his win price of between $9 and $10. As good as the Oaks winner was, getting paid an extra $2 wasnt worth it.

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by Gander

Except with the case of Friesan Fires, whose double was coming back $11.40 as opposed to his win price of between $9 and $10. As good as the Oaks winner was, getting paid an extra $2 wasnt worth it.

The Oaks/Derby double is a terrible bet if you are using favorites. For longshots though you are going to get much more value than you'll ever get in the Derby win pool.

[Gander]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

The Oaks/Derby double is a terrible bet if you are using favorites. For longshots though you are going to get much more value than you'll ever get in the Derby win pool.

Exactly. I bet a medium horse who went off 12/1 and whose double from Rachael was coming back $39. So about a $12-13 difference which isnt exactly great but in this case worth it just for adding her.