Democratic Presidents outperform Republicans in 11 of 12 economic measures

[Thepaindispenser]

Riot nothing you say is clever, original, or funny. You are downright nasty and the more you get buried with your outdated failed views, the nastier you get, which I have to admit is quite entertaining.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

Riot nothing you say is clever, original, or funny. You are downright nasty and the more you get buried with your outdated failed views, the nastier you get, which I have to admit is quite entertaining.

Click.

Treat.

[Thepaindispenser]

You still have never said anything clever, original, or funny you filthy liar.

[Danzig]

http://hosted2.ap.org/apdefault/3d28...bdebc077df907c


just saw this article on ap. and those not sure who to vote for-keep in mind that one of romney's brilliant ideas is to remove what scant regulations were put back on banks after the big bubble burst. and also keep in mind, even with placing those regulations, that we are still having banks wreaking havoc-witness jp morgan's huge loss earlier this year, that keeps seeming to grow. then there's libor.....
the vast majority of our ills was caused by banking, why would anyone want to go back to those rules (or lack thereof)???


and for the latest update i've seen on jp morgan:

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/...illion-down-9/

[Clip-Clop]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...pense-of-smal/

They are so sneaky. A banking act that helps those exact banks it is meant to prevent from doing things wrong.
A healthcare bill that makes insurance companies rich sounds like a fine idea.
Transparency rules!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Clip-Clop

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...pense-of-smal/

They are so sneaky. A banking act that helps those exact banks it is meant to prevent from doing things wrong.
A healthcare bill that makes insurance companies rich sounds like a fine idea.
Transparency rules!

' regulatory burden '

at a meeting a few months back, new regulations were mentioned. the amount of new rules and the amount of new burdens placed on businesses is astronomical. and we wonder why the business climate is so untenable...

to hell with dodd frank, they should have just repealed the repeal of glass-steagall. it worked ok, which is why banks wanted it gone. and dodd-frank didn't keep jp morgan from losing billions earlier this year.
why would you protect the very monoliths who caused all the problems? it's so ass-backward.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser

You still have never said anything clever, original, or funny you filthy liar.

Click.

Treat.

[Clip-Clop]

Originally Posted by Danzig

' regulatory burden '

at a meeting a few months back, new regulations were mentioned. the amount of new rules and the amount of new burdens placed on businesses is astronomical. and we wonder why the business climate is so untenable...

to hell with dodd frank, they should have just repealed the repeal of glass-steagall. it worked ok, which is why banks wanted it gone. and dodd-frank didn't keep jp morgan from losing billions earlier this year.
why would you protect the very monoliths who caused all the problems? it's so ass-backward.

Why do you think? I know you know already.