![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm pretty sure that your understanding of the question is correct...now we need to see which strategy is better...(makes you more money)
Quote:
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So if I make these bets every race over the course of the meet, Which bet will turn the highest $$$? |
#84
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thought so, Thanks!!!
![]() |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry if I missed this but how are you handling cases when the top two horses are both over 10-1? Are you counting the place money for both horses and counting it as two races in the sample? Presumably the best place payouts for a longshot will occur when another longshot is in the top two with it.
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes...any horse that is over 10-1 and finishes first or second counts. There are two possible examples in any race. |
#87
|
||||
|
||||
![]() DAY ONE MARCH 8, 2007
Gulfstream: Race 6-- Grits: 24.40 RS: 31.80 Race 8-- Grits: 39.80 RS: 50.00 Race 9-- Grits: 38.20 RS: 55.00 Aqueduct: Race 1-- Grits: 14.00 RS: 6.50 Race 7-- Grits: 36.60 RS: 48.80 Santa Anita: Race 5--Grits: 26.60 RS: 37.80 DAY ONE FINAL: Grits- 179.60 RS: 229.90 Total Races: 6 Last edited by randallscott35 : 03-08-2007 at 07:50 PM. |
#88
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
![]() counting the win bets takes away from this report in my opinion.
should just be $2 Place vs $2 Straight exacta (fav over the 10-1 and over shot) |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
thats fine.... you are off to a good start |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
![]() yeah, i personally feel that you will lose.. no offense
![]() but you got off to a good start! |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
![]() but hey... win or lose this is still very informative and maybe will change the way you wager to get a better ROI
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Complete day one standings now posted.
Side Note: A thought. When two 10-1 horses or higher finish 1-2 we are assuming that we both have the winner. Technically we should rotate each time that happens, b/c the place bet will be higher or lower depending on which horse over 10-1 we actually had...Maybe it all comes out in the wash. I guess it will b/c we will just keep on assuming that we both have the winner. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RS, I'm going to say this ONE MORE TIME ONLY.
This study is not about/or to include ANY win wager, NONE. Don't show a thing about wins or win payouts. Forget that completely. The study is about the following: Money wagered to place on a longshot verses money wagered on, instead, a straight exacta play. Randall: Betting $2. on a longshot at 10/1 or better. And posting the place figure paid out only. Grits: Betting a $2 straight exacta with the chalk on top and the longshot at 10/1 or better underneath. If my horses don't run 1-2. I get nothing. ************************************************** **** The races that need viewing are races where: (1) chalk has won and a longshot at 10/1 or better has run underneath. (2) where a longshot at 10/1 or better has won the race and we are using the place payout. (3) where a longshot at 10/1 or better has run second, and again we are using the place payout. Is anyone misunderstanding the study, or the wagers? If any of today's results shows win amounts remove them, please. They are not inclusive to the study, and therefore confusing. Now, what am I missing, anything? Randall, Andy, help me out ok. Last edited by Grits : 03-08-2007 at 08:41 PM. |