Curlin didn't look invincible...

sdjcom · #1 08-30-2008, 07:53 PM

A slow last quarter, just beat a speedball by 1 lenght and lug out a little, and looked dead-tired after race, I thought it was replay of Haskell except BB won by 3 lenghts, what do you think DT'ers

#2 08-30-2008, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdjcom

A slow last quarter, just beat a speedball by 1 lenght and lug out a little, and looked dead-tired after race, I thought it was replay of Haskell except BB won by 3 lenghts, what do you think DT'ers

He's not anywhere close to invincible, if he was why not run in the BCC ?

Merlinsky · #3 08-30-2008, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdjcom

A slow last quarter, just beat a speedball by 1 lenght and lug out a little, and looked dead-tired after race, I thought it was replay of Haskell except BB won by 3 lenghts, what do you think DT'ers

Actually BB only won by 1 3/4 lengths.....not that anyone's counting... except the Thoroughbred Times, and the DRF, and...well, my eyeballs.

I think it'd be hilarious if they both make the Clark and both lose. I think there's more of an argument to be made of BB's form having not progressed and Curlin being less than fit. It's gonna be harder to get the former to change than the latter. It's entirely possible I suppose that both are off their game. Is anybody running a final quarter with any speed these days? I'm trying to figure out who it is so I can guess who's gonna sneak in the back door on these jokers. How'd Colonel John and Go Between come in? I got the impression those too were not the quickest.

cowgirlintexas · #4 08-30-2008, 09:40 PM

Perhaps Assman is trying not to squeeze all the j"uice outta the lemon" so to speak..

and... save something in the tank for the next race..Which will most likely be his last.

sdjcom · #5 08-30-2008, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas

Perhaps Assman is trying not to squeeze all the j"uice outta the lemon" so to speak..

and... save something in the tank for the next race..Which will most likely be his last.

Curlin was all out to win, no saving any gas in the tank here.

sdjcom · #6 08-30-2008, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Who said Curlin was invincible?

nobody, the statement was in a question form to start a discussion.

sdjcom · #7 08-30-2008, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Curlin looked short to me. I'm not sure how cranked he was, but I find it hard to believe today's race was his "A" race. Maybe his form is in decline, or the turf start took a lot out of him, or the trip to Dubai is taking it's toll. Who knows, but I don't think Asmussen would change spots with anyone right now.

I agree, but I feel he just had an off day.

VOL JACK · #8 08-31-2008, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdjcom

I agree, but I feel he just had an off day.

Curlin just seems like the type that is just gonna run as fast as he has to, to win the race.
It was a good race if the track was as speed biased as I think it might have been. NY tracks have a way doing that before the big races, as we have all seen. I thought after the first race the track was gonna be a tiring surface. Then watching the 2 stakes it looked like Monmouth.

CSC · #9 08-31-2008, 09:45 AM

Curlin was there for the taking yesterday, he ran his eyeballs out to just squeak by a 40-1 shot that set contested fast fractions, someone questioned me why I kept posting I was going to try to beat Curlin yesterday, I think the answer was clear yesterday, at .35 to the dollar he was life and death to get up yesterday. My mind hasn't changed that's 2 average performances in a row for Curlin since coming back from Dubai. Whether he doesn't like Saratoga, or the turf. It wasn't the same Curlin I have seen prior Dubai.

Thunder Gulch · #10 08-31-2008, 09:57 AM

I agree with a lot of you here. Whether he was a little short or not, he just didn't have the same explosion we want to see from him. Has anyone ever come back from the Dubai trip with the same horse? That trip just seems to bring a lot of champions down from their pinnacle on the way home.

CSC · #11 08-31-2008, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thunder Gulch

I agree with a lot of you here. Whether he was a little short or not, he just didn't have the same explosion we want to see from him. Has anyone ever come back from the Dubai trip with the same horse? That trip just seems to bring a lot of champions down from their pinnacle on the way home.

I think that Dubai 'curse' is at times coincidental, however I agree he didn't win like a 3/10 shot should with the set up he got. Still we have seen what the Spa usually does to champions, Ginger Punch also got up mostly on will, and Curlin did the same yesterday.

ArlJim78 · #12 08-31-2008, 01:05 PM

i think its way after the fact to blame dubai. he looked sharp in his first outing after dubai, the one in KY where Einstein was second.

with that said, he does seem to be on the decline for whatever reason.

dalakhani · #13 08-31-2008, 01:10 PM

Tough Crowd. Everything played against Curlin yesterday. He gets banged into pretty good by Divine Park. Then the dynamics of the race didnt help. Past the Point may have been 40-1 but he didnt run like it. He ran his eyeballs out. Him setting those fractions and being that far out in front forced Curlin to start his move well before the turn. That was a long move to sustain.

Pletny of excuses for him to lose and he won. Not a great performance but certainly a good one.

Quiet Chris · #14 08-31-2008, 01:12 PM

The horse is not invincible. Commentator probably would have beaten him yesterday, except for the fact that Commentator might have not shown up.

Curlin's JCGC will be the real test to see what he is made of. They have been shipping him around the world and changing surfaces on him all year.

The horse is clearly the best dirt horse in the world though. There doesn't appear to be anyone out there that can take him in a 10f dirt race.

TheSpyder · #15 08-31-2008, 01:17 PM

Great horses don't always win by open lengths..Check the Champions book. He ran a good race and I don't think he was short, I think just enough was asked of him to win.

Spyder

dalakhani · #16 08-31-2008, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quiet Chris

The horse is not invincible. Commentator probably would have beaten him yesterday, except for the fact that Commentator might have not shown up.
Curlin's JCGC will be the real test to see what he is made of. They have been shipping him around the world and changing surfaces on him all year.

The horse is clearly the best dirt horse in the world though. There doesn't appear to be anyone out there that can take him in a 10f dirt race.

I have to agree with Dahoss here. That first paragraph is classic.

Almost as good as "my aunt probably could have been my uncle except she might not have a d i c k".

the_fat_man · #17 08-31-2008, 01:24 PM

I see that we're making assumptions again based on numbers without considering the race dynamics. They went, essentially, 1-2 around the track in fast fractions, there were ZERO moves in the race, and Curlin came from off the pace to run down the speed. Anyone who thinks this wasn't impressive really needs to get on a bike, get on the track, and try it out. Try chasing a fast pace and then running the leader down on your own. This might radically alter one's perception of trips.

Cannon Shell · #18 08-31-2008, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

I see that we're making assumptions again based on numbers without considering the race dynamics. They went, essentially, 1-2 around the track in fast fractions, there were ZERO moves in the race, and Curlin came from off the pace to run down the speed. Anyone who thinks this wasn't impressive really needs to get on a bike, get on the track, and try it out. Try chasing a fast pace and then running the leader down on your own. This might radically alter one's perception of trips.

Please spare me the bike riding crap. So now sitting 4th behind a rapid pace set by inferior horses on a seemingly fair track ISNT a good trip? So if they go too slow on the front we can blame a slow pace but if they go too fast we can blame a fast pace? He won because the 3 horse couldnt run the last eighth in 13.20.

#19 08-31-2008, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

I see that we're making assumptions again based on numbers without considering the race dynamics. They went, essentially, 1-2 around the track in fast fractions, there were ZERO moves in the race, and Curlin came from off the pace to run down the speed. Anyone who thinks this wasn't impressive really needs to get on a bike, get on the track, and try it out. Try chasing a fast pace and then running the leader down on your own. This might radically alter one's perception of trips.

I recently participated in a 5k and was trying to close on a fast pace. Needless to say things didn't go according to plan...

#20 08-31-2008, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Why is all of the s hit in the front? Shouldn't it be in the back?

I'm not very knowledgeable in bowel dynamics. Ask fatty.