|
|
 |
|
#1
06-02-2009, 10:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NHRL: National Horse Racing League??
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...or-league.aspx
Suprised people haven't had an opinion on it. Some of the examples make sense. 
|
|
#2
06-02-2009, 10:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Racehorse owners key
Racehorse owners are the only ones in racing with the commercial rights to establish and operate a major league. If the racehorse owners form a major league and establish a national schedule for the highest level of the sport, how would they change the current system? Here’s one way: Once a structure is established, the league’s representatives could meet with the tracks and work out a schedule and how they will partner on revenue for the coming years. Included would be a completed contract to present to the state racing commissions for approval. The Breeders’ Cup already has established this protocol.We currently have more than 55,000 races each year. A major league might initially involve only 500 races, just about the same number as graded stakes. The rest of racing would continue to be conducted as is. We could then have 48 weekends of major league racing (none on Triple Crown and Breeders’ Cup weekends).Based upon Breeders’ Cup and Triple Crown race-day handles, we could project an average handle of $100-million per weekend day, with revenue to the major league being 10% of that handle. The average major league weekend would thus gross $10-million for purses and operations.If the league can then use traditional major league revenue sources and achieve a level of success similar to the smallest one, the NHL, we could add another $2.6-billion. Combined with the revenue from handle, this would deliver revenue of more than $3-billion. After operational costs, an average purse for the 500 races could be as much as ¬$5-million, providing a $45-million race day.That is a pretty good incentive to own a racehorse, to own stallions and broodmares, and to get involved in racing. These are not crazy numbers for a major league.Just like the other major leagues, the high purses would attract and lead to acquisitions of the best horses from around the world to add further to the quality of the racing product. That would lead to an expanded international revenue stream. Unfortunately, "racehorse owners" are fiercely competitive on a very personal level. Therefore, while this is great in theory, it will never happen.
|
|
#3
06-02-2009, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I imagine this would require excessive
amounts of cooperation. So its basically impossible.
|
|
#4
06-03-2009, 08:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
06-03-2009, 11:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Projecting handle based on the current success of the Breeder's Cup is extremely shaky reasoning, IMO. The BC is successful because of its unique place and unique status in the racing calendar.
The analogy with golf is weak, too. In golf, you get to see the same big names battle it out many times during the year. And they stick around for more than 1 year, too. No one rushed Jack Nicklaus off to stud duty. (hmm, maybe Evening Attire would still be racing if there was a Seniors Tour for horses.) --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
|
|
#6
06-03-2009, 08:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
A format similar to the Harness racing Grand Circuit, which travels from track to track, presenting major races. Unfortunately, the Grand Circuit hasn't survived the 'big race bulldozers' like the Meadowlands very well, only a few of the 'lesser' tracks retaining their week or so of superior racing.
A circuit for older horses was tried a few years back, with points being awarded for finishing in the money in a series of top handicap races. Back around the time of Criminal Type and Festin, I believe. Forget why it folded. (Old people forget things.)
|
|
#7
06-04-2009, 02:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.c...9643/index.htm All 10 of the races in the series were televised in 1991. Farma Way took top prize. In 1992 Strike The Gold won the series and the $750K first prize. Best Pal was second ($375K). I'm not sure, but I think '93 was the last year of the Series. I couldn't find who won that year. --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
|
|
#8
06-04-2009, 02:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020) Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
|
|
#9
06-04-2009, 07:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sports wagering on a more widespread basis could actually help racing in the long term. The slots players cannot be converted, but a newly minted bettor of NFL games can. These bettors are likely to make their wagering decisions after careful consideration of various pieces of information. They will enjoy the mental exercise as much as winning some jingle when the Saints cover the spread, and it may not be so difficult to entice them to take a shot at racing
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there!
|
|
#10
06-04-2009, 08:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just did some reading to remind myself how the series ended: Farma Way and Festin decided it in the Woodward, Farma Way coming away with 1st place money by finishing ahead of Festin; BUT, In Excess won the Woodward. In the Breeder's Cup, Black Tie Affair beat all of them, and nailed HOY, too. Maybe that sapped some of the luster from the "Championship Series". --Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
|
|
#11
06-05-2009, 12:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
06-05-2009, 08:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The American Racing Championship Series was the brainchild of the very sharp Barry Weisbord who has brought many innovations and ideas to the game. Weisbord made 2 very well meant attempts to craft this kind of 'league' concept, elliciting the support of television and most of the elements that should have made it successful.
While there may have been a number of contributing factors, it is widely accepted that what ultimately doomed the effort was a particular kind of disdain for 'people like Weisbord' by Oaklawn's Charlie Cella. Here is an Andy Beyer piece about the ARCS demise from 1993: Good Idea Is Left At Gate (August 18, 1993) BY ANDREW BEYER The Pacific Classic was created to be a climactic event of the American Championship Racing Series, the program of stakes races for the country's best older horses. But when the $1 million race is run Saturday at Del Mar, it will be a finale in a sense that the series' creator, Barry Weisbord, never imagined. This is the end of the ACRS, which has been terminated by the tracks that staged it. The ACRS's three-year existence might constitute just a small footnote to racing history. But its demise reveals some hard and enduring truths about horse racing in America, and suggests just how ill-equipped this industry is to implement new ideas. Weisbord's idea was an innovative one: tie together some of the nation's top stakes races as part of a series and give a lucrative bonus award to the horses who performed best throughout the year. He wanted to foster rivalries that would make horse racing more interesting for television. He wanted to stimulate fans' interest in races from far-flung parts of the country. And the idea worked. In the ACRS's first season, Farma Way and Festin won early season stakes in California and Arkansas. When they went to Baltimore to renew their rivalry in the Pimlico Special, Marylanders knew them after watching them on simulcasts or national television coverage. They were stars - not unknowns from California. And by the time they came to the Pacific Classic for a race that was nationally televised by ABC, they were well-known nationally. The ACRS was a winner. Or so it seemed to the public. But behind the scenes, relationships were often tense between Weisbord's ACRS organization and the tracks that hosted the races. Weisbord rubbed plenty of people the wrong way, as he himself acknowledged: "I'd go in and say, `I know these concepts work. We know how do do this.' I had a passion because I believed in the concept. And I caused some animosity." Key tracks defected from the program for reasons that were often small and petty; they didn't want to sacrifice their own interests to serve Weisbord's vision of the greater good of the sport. Del Mar president Joe Harper said, "People who had a prestige race felt they didn't need the series." Arlington Racecourse wouldn't join because the ACRS threatened to upstage its own big attraction, the Arlington Million. Oaklawn Park dropped out because president Charles Cella thought Weisbord was spending too much money. But the crushing defection was that of Santa Anita, which pulled out this year because track officials didn't want to encourage their best horses to leave the state. Without the $1 million Santa Anita Handicap as part of the series, the ACRS couldn't create a meaningful East vs. West rivalry. Despite all of these problems, the member tracks of the ACRS had appeared willing to continue the series in 1994, and perhaps even expand it to include other categories of horses besides older distance runners. But last month the ACRS board issued an abrupt news release saying that the series was being abandoned. This decision was a result of racing politics - and also, evidently, of a gross miscalculation. The participants in the ACRS are also members of the Thoroughbred Racing Associations, the organization that includes most of the country's major tracks. Dave Vance, the head of the TRA, also had been chairman of the ACRS - brought aboard to calm some of the waves that Weisbord had stirred up. The TRA has never been known as a particularly innovative or effective organization. But it thought it could stage a national racing series without the involvement of Weisbord and his ACRS. Vance was quoted as saying that the TRA tracks were "exploring other options which follow the same basic concept of the ACRS but expand its horizons." That option was supposedly a venture with ABC to telecast more than 20 major stakes events in a format that would lend itself to a national wager. Track executives thought the deal was set when they terminated the ACRS. But now it appears that there is no such deal. ABC might have been miffed when the Breeders' Cup extended its contract with NBC: Why should ABC telecast all of these stakes races that are a preamble to the championship event on another network? Whatever the reason, the ACRS is dead, and at this moment the industry has nothing with which to replace it. What is so worrisome about the ACRS's history is that it shows how poorly horse racing functions as an industry. Track owners are forever talking about the need for industry-wide initiatives, and there's a lot of talk within the sport nowadays about the need for a national commissioner. But the ACRS demonstrated that many tracks weren't willing to make small sacrifices or to suppress petty animosities for the sake of their common good. For Weisbord, it's been a disillusioning experience. "There's a lot more hypocrisy in this business," he said, "than there is mutual support." Weisbord has spent his life in horse racing. He revolutionized the breeding business with his creation of the Matchmaker Sales Co., selling shares in stallions by auction. He helped revive the Pimlico Special and conceived Laurel's International Turf Festival when he worked with the late Frank De Francis. He owned the champion sprinter Safely Kept. He loves the sport. But he's discouraged. "The last few years have worn me out," he said. "I'm going to hang out my shingle in public relations and marketing and try to wean myself out of this business. I'd love to stay involved in racing, but I think this is not a business that I'd want to put all my eggs into."
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
|
|
#13
06-05-2009, 10:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
A few moons ago, the Mid-Atlantic had the MATCH series (Mid-Atlantic Throughbred Championship). Alan Foreman was the CEO of the series and I think his biggest struggle was getting the tracks to cooperate. Seems like the series included races at Pimlico, Philly Park, Delpark, etc. It might have lasted a couple of years, and seemed to be a good idea, but I think the infighting between the tracks killed it.
|
|
#14
06-06-2009, 05:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
Linear Mode
