Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-06-2009, 04:39 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
I didn't realize I couldn't have an opinion on lasix if I wasn't a trainer. I missed that memo....Fact is I'd rather not have it like a good portion of the world. That's it.
Hey believe whatever you want. Want to believe Lasix masks things and creates genetic mutants, knock yourself out.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:11 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
The standards of intellectually honest reporting are relatively low. I'd place the standards of writing on a higher level.
Yes that would be more accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:01 PM
Fulla Sheets's Avatar
Fulla Sheets Fulla Sheets is offline
Monmouth Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Hey believe whatever you want. Want to believe Lasix masks things and creates genetic mutants, knock yourself out.
So thats how Scav got that way.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:04 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulla Sheets
So thats how Scav got that way.
Scavs is one of a kind.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:08 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

19 years later and we are having the same argument.

From your favorite rag no less Chuck.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/08/sp...-evidence.html
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:30 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
19 years later and we are having the same argument.

From your favorite rag no less Chuck.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/08/sp...-evidence.html
And I still fail to see a reason why banning Lasix would do anything positive. Hell we banned steroids, nothing changed except field size is down. We banned toe grabs with absolutely no positive effect. We tried artificial surfaces with negative results.

Lasix is a false villain.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:34 PM
randallscott35's Avatar
randallscott35 randallscott35 is offline
Idlewild Airport
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 9,687
Default

Well Dr. Gorman thought it could be used to mask things back then. I'm sure two decades later he has changed his mind.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:47 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
Well Dr. Gorman thought it could be used to mask things back then. I'm sure two decades later he has changed his mind.
Do we have to go through the list of technological advances since then? I was on a medication committee that met with the KHRA over proposals for updating medication rules a few years ago. One of the chemists on the panel said with absolute certainty that no diuretic (specifically Salix) can prevent detection of known substances at the levels that they can now test at. Of course he was bragging but the explanation was part of an idea that we needed to update the thresholds of allowable medications because the rules were holdovers from a different era of testing. Naturally there was no funding to do the research.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-06-2009, 08:12 PM
richard's Avatar
richard richard is offline
Hollywood Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: cheap seats
Posts: 951
Default

Take a look at the pdf file of the April vet bill. Almost $1,500 , mostly for injections is cause for concern ? Or not ?

The link is within the NYT article itself. About 19 injections for just 3 weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:01 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
. And there is virtually no way to duplicate their set up.
Explain??
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:10 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Explain??
One backside, two tracks, complete surveillance 24 hours a day, vets work for Jockey Club, small horse population, good weather, no due process, trainers/owners limited numbers, form stewards, gigantic budget.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:14 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard
Take a look at the pdf file of the April vet bill. Almost $1,500 , mostly for injections is cause for concern ? Or not ?

The link is within the NYT article itself. About 19 injections for just 3 weeks.
There is nothing that is anything but routine on those vet bills. Close to $300 of that is for gastrogard which is an innocuous ulcer treatment. Over $500 is diagnostic work including multiple xrays, ultra sound and endoscopic examination.
From the top it looks he electrolytes/vitamins and fluids which is normal. Naquasone paste is used to reduce minor inflammation and was given in oral form. Liquamycin is an antibiotic. Panacur powerpack is a series of 5 dewormers. On 4/13 he was given what looks like a pre-work series of enzymes, Bute and Adequan which is a joint treatment that helps reduce the inflammation and pain of degenerative joint disease, but also to help stop the degenerative process while stimulating the production of new joint fluid and new cartilage components. Adequan would be given in the muscle in this case.

On the 14th he was given Lasix before the work and scoped afterwards. He must have had some inflammation as they ultrasounded the right leg. he also got another shot of antibiotics.

On the 15th he had his digital tendon sheath injected with what looks like a combo of Amikacin which is an antibiotic used with bacterial infections and possibly polyglycan which is hyaluromnic acid, glucosamine and sodium chondroitan and possibly vetalog which is a corticosteroid used to fight inflamation. He also got a shot of Baytril which is also an antibiotic.

He got antibiotics till the 21st when he worked and was scoped again.

The next week he only got vitamins

On the 28th he worked again and bled (see EIPH slight) and both ankles were injected with hyalrulonic acid.

The next day he got 1 shot of antibiotics and vitamins

The next day he received a DMSO jug, a shot of Robaxin which is a muscle relaxant and a shot of banamine which reduces inflammation.

The day before the derby he got a shot of bute, amino acids, and robinul and sodium iodide. The Robinul and sodium iodide are usually used as a prerace treatment for a bleeder.

The rest is self explanatory.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:52 PM
chucklestheclown chucklestheclown is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,562
Default

Fascinating. What is lost here is that IEAH vetted him out and he was, presumably, fine, or fine enough. They should sue their vet and/or insurance company and not Lanzman. And yes, I'm a lawyer so I am fully qualified to speak on this matter.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:13 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by randallscott35
What's your point? Lasix isn't natural. If we went to hay and oats and no lasix I wouldn't care if a ton of horses couldn't run. We need a healthy breed. Not the best bleeders around....And the bigger isssue is lasix is a masking agent.
What do you do with all of those horses then?


All horses have the potential to become bleeders - this is a good and brief article on what is going on in the horses lungs while under exercise:

http://www.ctba.com/03magazine/jul/AskVets.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:26 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucklestheclown
Fascinating. What is lost here is that IEAH vetted him out and he was, presumably, fine, or fine enough. They should sue their vet and/or insurance company and not Lanzman. And yes, I'm a lawyer so I am fully qualified to speak on this matter.
I'm interested to know on what basis would you sue the vet and insurance co?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 10-07-2009, 02:50 AM
richard's Avatar
richard richard is offline
Hollywood Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: cheap seats
Posts: 951
Default

Let me take a moment and thank Trainer CS for his time and shared insight into these matters .
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 10-07-2009, 04:06 AM
magic_idol's Avatar
magic_idol magic_idol is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Free the Sheeple
Posts: 1,392
Default

They did a study in australia were they scoped 1000 horses after hard work & a amazing result came back 82 % of these horses had bleed in some form , Not all horses bleed out both nostrils which is classed as a "bleeder".
I Have seen & backed unfortunately quite a few bleeders who dont bleed out the nose but when suddenly did not preform or have the classic fly for 800 mtrs the stop come back as what the vet calls white ie when it's scoped it's bleed so much it's white inside.
Bleeders are banned & no laxis is allowed in australia in case the horse falls down dead .but the reallity this never happens, more likely to be a heart attack than a bleeding attack so the non use of laxis is absolutely stupid,
On a completely different note if a racehorse has sore feet but is absolutely safe shouldnt it run on bute as its not affecting it's preformance just easing the horses pain when it runs for 1 min 12 secs.
Drug laws are made for people not horses.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:41 AM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richard
Take a look at the pdf file of the April vet bill. Almost $1,500.
Actually, the vet bill for the six week period was over $3,000. The bills to each owner were for only 50%, presumably reflecting their respective ownership interests.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:53 AM
Linny's Avatar
Linny Linny is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,104
Default

Chuck, thank you for the detailed explanation. I understand joint injections and Adequan etc (my show hunter gets his hocks done before the show season each year) but is an antibiotic regimen that common in a horse healthy enough to be training as the favorite for the KY Derby?
I think that IWR was purchased before the Wood, meaing that a pre-purchase exam (PPE) must have been done at some point in March. I've seen PPE's done for average pleasure and show horses that reveal the start of tendon strain. I would imagine that if a buyer is paying for a multi million dollar share in a major Derby contender that the exam might be even more thorough-though I'm not sure in what areas.
Chuckles, most vets will tell you that they can do the exam and comment on the horse's current condition but cannot predict future soundness or even assess how he may handle a particlular job in the future. Unless a vet simply didn't do an ordered test or stepped well out of role and advised the purchase of a lame/unsuitable horse, it's hard to sue a vet for anything regarding a PPE.
__________________
RIP Monroe.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:53 AM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucklestheclown
Fascinating. What is lost here is that IEAH vetted him out and he was, presumably, fine, or fine enough. They should sue their vet and/or insurance company and not Lanzman. And yes, I'm a lawyer so I am fully qualified to speak on this matter.

why should they sue their insurance company? We dont tell people to buy horses or not, thats for sure.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.