![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
07-11-2011, 06:47 PM
|
![dellinger63's Avatar](image.php?s=6a16ce4ba38846b2b8c1c8b8da2a3c8c&u=83&dateline=1434726780) |
Keeneland
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 10,072
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Not at all. It demonstrates that, once again, you are too lazy to click a link and learn what you are spouting off about.
Then, you wouldn't do something moronic, like post figures about Medicare changes, generalized costs, etc., and completely fail to mention the portion of the ACA we are discussing.
Do you even understand the difference? I don't think so. I suppose I could post a bunch of facts and figures about insurance companies in general, it would have as much context (none) as what you've introduced, in reference to the one portion of the ACA under discussion in this thread.
Yes, Dell. You copied a bunch of generalized one-sided figures about the ACA. Good for you!
Which, btw, doesn't even mention the other side (savings) - which makes it deficit neutral.
And not one thing of what you listed anything at all to do with the section of the ACA I was posting about. Which again, is the whole damn point. You have no understanding of the ACA, and have never made any real attempt to do so.
"The ACA sucks! Obama sucks!" - yeah, we get that's how you feel.
|
and you still can't answer what company you left and who you went with!
|