Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:45 PM
Calzone Lord's Avatar
Calzone Lord Calzone Lord is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,552
Default Projecting figures for very old races.

Two people now have asked me about how I do this. It's very simple to do.

The one huge advantage you have of making figures for a day from 30 years ago VS making figures for yesterdays races -- is that you can pull up forms and results for all of the horses subsquent races and finishes.

The hardest part with these old figures is gauging how class levels of old relate to class levels of todays racing. Thankfully, class levels were MUCH simpler and straight-forward decades ago.

Here's an example:

May 27th 1979 Belmont Park. Three dirt routes.











The three races are a 35K open claiming race for older males at Belmont (Todays Beyer Par for this class level at BEL is a 91) An N3X ALW for older females (Todays Beyer Par for this class level is a 89) and the Peter Pan Stakes (The Beyer par for the Peter Pan is a 103)

Coastal won the Peter Pan in 1:47 flat. His time was 21 points faster than Peat Moss ran in his 5.75 length romping win. Coastal's time was also 37 points faster than Propitiate in her 3.5 length N3X Alw win.

In theory, because of inflation, an open 35K claiming race from 1979 should be tougher than an open 35K race from today. I translate an open 35K from '79 to equal an open 50K and a 94 par from today.

Anyway, it was clearly an above par 35K CLM race. Peat Moss was making his first start at 9 furlongs since a Remsen try where he was bet some against Believe It and Alydar. He had closed strongly at a mile last out.



Peat Moss famously would rise from the claiming ranks and once won at 2 miles under 145lbs and was 2nd by a half length to John Henry in the Jockey Club Gold Cup.

* Debtor's Haven (2nd by 5.75 lengths) was first and second in two prior starts and would be 1st and 2nd in two subsquent starts at the same class level. Has the surrounding form of a low 90's horse.

* Lancer's Pride (3rd by 9.75 lengths) would win an open 30K claiming race at Belmont next time out...just a few weeks later. Lancer's Pride was a 42-time winner for his career! Consistant with a high 80's horse)

* Framarco (4th by 12.5 lengths) would come back to run 3rd and 2nd at the open 30K claiming level at Belmont in his next two starts.


As for older female N3X alw winner Propitiate. She would go on to make over 200K in her career and be three-time Graded Stakes placed... but she would only finish 3rd in an alw next out and her clear win would rate below par for the class level. The 2nd place finisher Abold Dame would run 4th in an alw next out...she did become a stakes winner a few months later. 3rd place finisher Shirley The Queen had been 2nd in the Cicada Stakes two months earlier -- she would run 4th in an ALW at the same level next out.

Finally, 13-length Peter Pan winner Coastal. He was a wildly underrated and extremely fast 3-year-old. He won the Belmont Stakes next out. Crushed the undefeated Private Account despite carrying 12lbs more in the Dwyer. And took the Grade 1 Monmouth Invitational under 127lbs by a clear margin to go 6-for-6 with all clear margin wins to start his 3yo season.

Lucy's Axe (2nd by 13 lengths) would win a stakes race next out. He won the Rebel Stakes earlier in the year over Tunerup. He would win a Grade 3 a few races later. Consistant with a par 2nd place finisher for a race like the Peter Pan.

Pianist (3rd by 14.25 lengths) would run 2nd in an ALW race next out and finish 3rd in the Jim Dandy. Consistant with a par 3rd place finisher for a race like the Peter Pan.

Projected figures for this day:

Peat Moss: 101
Debtor's Haven: 92
Lancer's Pride: 85
Framarco: 81


Propitiate: 85
Abold Dame: 79
Shirley The Queen: 78


Coastal: 122
Lucy's Axe: 101
Pianist: 99

It's takes a hell of a lot longer to explain them than to actually do them. But, that's basically the whole entire process I use for making historical projections of figures.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.