data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79885/79885d3d61b4329f7dacaf8b2e38aaaddebe627b" alt="Old"
05-23-2012, 01:32 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c419/2c4193d900321acf4bab55dff70f165acce297d3" alt="Indian Charlie's Avatar" |
Goodwood
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hailrazer
You have a sure thing at a small track. You got $150,000 to bet on him. Bet him on the nose and you win $15,000. Nice score but not what your hoping for on a sure thing.
Instead, you bet $9,000 on him early to drive his odds down. No one doubts he will win, but few bet him at short price. Bet $15,000 late on all other horses in the field to basically make every horse in the field 9-2 or 5-1 price range. You are in for $100,000. If your horse wins, you get back about half of what you bet into parimutuel pool. If he loses, you get back about 80% of that pool.
That leaves you $50,000 to throw at every off-shore and bookie you can come up with to try to win $250,000. If you can collect from them all, you clear $200,000 instead of $15,000. Lots of work and risk, but for $185,000 difference, I can see it.....
|
Agreed. I'm sure there are details we are not privy to, but it seems likely that they had a wagering outlet that was not parimutuel based.
|