data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79885/79885d3d61b4329f7dacaf8b2e38aaaddebe627b" alt="Old"
10-09-2007, 03:55 PM
|
Randwyck
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by parsixfarms
As an attorney, I'm well aware of a lawyer's obligation to advocate for his client. However, unless required by a court to represent a particular individual, I'm also very aware of the fact that a lawyer is free to pick and choose who his clients are. Unless the horseman's groups that Foreman represents believe that Biancone is being unfairly targeted - or are against stricter penalties for severe violations of the rules (I suspect that neither is the case), to my way of thinking, Foreman has made a poor choice in taking on this "crusade."
At a minimum, his comments suggest that professionally he does not believe in strong deterrents for rule breakers - and these statements come despite the fact that he is a Vice Chair of the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium. See www.rmtcnet.com. I wonder how the other members of an organization that has led the charge in trying to clean up the sport feel about "one of their own" representing Biancone in what is probably the most highly publicized/severe case in the past few years, and advocating for only a fine.
|
I agree 1000% and I think you very clearly expressed this point.
Eric
|