![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
01-09-2008, 06:21 PM
|
![miraja2's Avatar](image.php?s=efdfab64ee2715bbc68bf1428a29e7d4&u=201&dateline=1288984248) |
Arlington Park
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Glorious
I don't take the position that she will be great at 10f. That's not how I evaluate things. I don't think Groovy would be a great 10f runner either. However, if his competition was Meafara, Safely Kept, Very Subtle, and Pine Tree Lane, I'd increase his chances of winning at 10f. For me, it's about the competition that they will face more than their ability to handle a certain distance or surface. If she were facing true 10f horses, I might look at things different. But I don't see any horses that I think are true 10f horses in the entire crop. Well, let me ammend that. I see some but I think they are too slow. I didn't see a tired horse in her races. I saw a horse that I thought if they went around again, they still wouldn't have caught her. I'm not sure what is the best way to try to handicap things. If she was trying to do something against horses that had already proven they could do it, that would be different. But at this point, she's gone as far as any of them have and looked better, at least to me, than most of them have. I have never fallen into the camp that says that the way a horse finishes a race at one distance is a sure sign as to how they'll finish at another. I've seen 100's of late running sprinters that people think will relish the stretchout to 7f or a mile and they fail. I've seen many that finish well at 9f and people think that they are crying out for the 10th furlong of the Derby and they fail. I think that what we've seen is a horse that was trained and raced at 8.5f and she ran that distance.
|
Well I guess we have reached the heart of the disagreement.
I simply have no idea how you could watch those two races and come to that conclusion.
|