Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalakhani
I think Snipe was saying that makes izzo a good coach because he wins with little talent. I dont disagree (double negative-bad,bad,bad) that he is a good coach. He's a wonderful coach. I just scoff at the idea that he does it with not a lot of talent.
Your example is an excellent one. Look at that georgetown team. They were amazing. They pressed people out of existence. Any of those players could have started for virtually any team in the country. So they didnt do well in the pros? Doesnt matter.
I use to say that the 87 Indiana hoosier team was a testament to how great a coach Bob Knight was. They were the only NCAA champ that i recall that won a title with no 1st round draft picks (present or future) on the team. Think about that. But on further review, they had excellent college talent. Steve Alford was a 4 year all american, olympian and one of the best players ever to come out of the state of indiana. Daryl Thomas was a wonderful college player. Ricky Calloway was a good college player. There was plenty of talent on that team. Its just that none of that talent translated into pro talent.
|
exactly - look at the '87 team they beat in the final 4 - sherman douglas , derek coleman were kinda busts as nba players coinsidering where they were drafted , ron skiely had a good pro career and developed more in the pros
as for the unlv team they beat , daddio paddio was a bust and banks who couldn't miss that year for the tark didn't make in in the nba for very long of at all if i remember
04-07-2009, 11:04 AM
Threaded Mode