![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34079149...shington_post/
skeptics having a field day. http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalca...limate-center/ from the above: Officials at Hadley, a leading global-warming research center, have apparently confirmed to a Kiwi publication that the documents are genuine. -and- Some of the old emails from scientists made public apparently make references to things like “hid[ing] the decline,” referring to global temperature series and different ways to slice and dice climate data. and one of the emails being seized upon: Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm, Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998. Thanks for the comments, Ray. Cheers Phil Prof. Phil Jones Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx |