|
|
 |
|
#31
01-23-2010, 02:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Corporations are not voters or individuals. They have always had "freedom of speech" as corporate entities to support candidates of their choice financially and in the press, with ads, etc. I think the "Tea Baggers" are not understanding what just happened here, if they are supporting this. Are they not against big government, government involvement and interference, corporate control of government, and for the rights of the individual above all else? This ruling is completely opposite to that 
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts 
|
Threaded Mode