Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS
So if she wins 20 in a row, including two Classics you will stick to your guns right? Thats exactly my point. Both fringes have invested so much emotionally that nothing, and i mean nothing, will change their minds.
To me if even if she finishes last she is a Hall of Famer and one of the best mares of all time. If she wins the Classic hard for me to argue she is not the best mare (didn't say horse) of all time.
I dont care what the quality of the competition is to win that many in a row, with that running style is simply amazing., Even if most of the wins were on the fake stuff.
I thought the voters got it right last year with HOY too.
|
Are you not comprehending? No one is denying that she is a hall of famer and one of the best mares of all time. And if she wins the Classic for a 2nd year in a row than she very well may be the best mare. BUT that isn't what the Z-tards will accept for her 'legacy'. We are constantly told she is one of the best if not THE best horse of all time. Once again, the streak is a great accomplishment but simply winning isn't enough to break into the pantheon. The hyperbole is what aggravates many of us. This isn't the "best field ever" assembled for the Classic. Last years wasn't either. She isn't the greatest horse ever. She shouldnt be horse of the year if she loses the Classic. People pointing these things out arent haters. They are simply grounded.