![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
09-25-2012, 02:00 PM
|
![Riot's Avatar](image.php?s=b4bf5a3ae12a80bfbd0b169bce70f4ba&u=662&dateline=1236044645) |
Keeneland
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
|
|
Obama's stimulus was a massive failure and it didn't work
Yeah. About that statement. It's been proven to be beyond-a-doubt false by economists.
Quote:
It produced a short-term recovery
.
We dropped 8.9 percent of GDP in Q4 2008
.
We lost 800,000 jobs in January 2009. We passed the stimulus. And then the next quarter we saw the biggest jobs improvement in 30 years.
The long-term reinvestment part is working.
It spent $90 billion for clean energy when we were spending just a few billion a year.
It’s doubled renewable energy.
It’s started an electric battery industry from scratch.
It jump-started the smart grid.
It’s bringing our pen-and-paper medical system into the digital age.
It’s got Race to the Top which is the biggest education program in decades.
It’s got the biggest middle-class tax cuts since the Reagan era.
It prevented seven million people from falling behind the poverty line.
|
Here's just one example, taking previous information from CBO data on stimulus success:
Warning: "graphs" and "facts" contained within
Quote:
Last year, Dylan Matthews did a thorough round-up of studies on the effectiveness of the stimulus.
His conclusion was that the stimulus worked to stem the damage of the economic collapse and improve the short-term economic outlook.
Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office issued data on whether the stimulus worked.
In turn, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities used that data to show–without a doubt–that the stimulus worked.
First, with the stimulus, gross domestic product is higher than it otherwise would have been:
![](http://jamelle.squarespace.com/storage/work-files/2011-11-23econ-f1.jpg)
Likewise, stimulus kept the unemployment rate from rising past 10 percent, and saved millions of jobs:
![](http://http://jamelle.squarespace.com/storage/work-files/2011-11-23econ-f2.jpg)
The problem isn’t that stimulus was ineffective, it’s that there wasn’t enough. In particular, balanced-budget requirements on the state level forced huge cuts in the public workforce, and imposed a huge amount of drag on the economy. If government employment were at the same level as it was at the end of 2008, unemployment would be at or below 7 percent. Additional aid to states would have kept those workers employed, but it was blocked (or cut) by Republicans and conservative Democrats.
It should also be said that Romney is in no position to squawk about the deficit; taken together, his policies would increase the deficit by an additional $6.2 trillion over the next decade, and at the same time, slash social spending for all but the wealthiest Americans..
The simple fact is this: When Romney claims–as he does on a near-daily basis–that the stimulus is responsible for our economic woes, he is peddling an easily debunked falsehood. But because this is the view of the Republican Party writ large, its treated as just another “side” in the debate, and not a deliberate attack on our shared reality.
http://prospect.org/article/hate-it-...timulus-worked
|
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
|