![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Either way, as long as the sample size is long enough (a whole meet), you should get a decent perspective on who is right.... Personally, if I understand this, Randall is saying that betting place is more worthwhile then playing an exacta, Grits is saying play the bomb with the chalk. SPEAKING IN Natural odds, just plain Natural odds (10 horse race, each horse has a 10% change of winning) Randall wins this argument in a landside BUT I would have to break out some crazy algerbra to figure out the odds (using 30% as favorite winning as a national average) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Data is data.....and the past will be the same as the future. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Grits : 03-07-2007 at 10:36 PM. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
A statistic sample in the 100s takes care of that. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I love constructive arguments....(not a single name called yet)
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I just realized what is fundementally wrong with this study....
You have to use any horse over 10-1 that WINS or PLACES ( there will be two in some races ). As, if your horse wins you get the place money and lose the exacta. In other words, the horses that run out are irrelevent, as you lose $2 either way, but the ones that win and run second are relevent. Even though we are saying " how would I do if it just places " you have to remember you cash both bets if it wins. That is why my first sample was so skewed. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]() No offense, but does this thread not target those whom play the tote board and odds with a couple minutes to post, the "numbers players" who love to dash to the teller and yell out their crazy exacta boxes, keys etc?
I like to find my horses and play them win and place no matter the odds anymore Pick 3's the same, as SCAVS WOULD SAY - FULL TILT Tilt is great, and I love it on Friday nights Dang, I gotta work till 9pm this Friday but am OFF ALL DAY ON SATURDAY! God bless MEADOWLANDS HARNESS RACING on Friday and Saturday nights! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() To further what I just said.....each particular horse is an example...i.e. the horse wins you get X for the place bet and lose the exacta and any horse that places you get X for place and Y for the exacta where Y can be zero.
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Actually let me think about this. We both would get the win end so maybe that is right...Now I'm confused.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm bored.
I looked at all of the available charts on Equibase, between Santa Anita, Gulfstream and Aqueduct. It only comprised eighteen race days total, but I went through them. I used Randall's original idea, of 10-1+ shot running in the top two versus a 10-1+ shot running behind the favorite (any favorite, lukewarm or odds-on) in the race. With that, it presumes that regardless of how you played it, that 10-1+ horse was the one you liked. The totals I got were: Aqueduct: Place Wagers: $139.20 Exacta: $222.40 Gulfstream: Place Wagers: $292.40 Exacta: $440.80 Santa Anita: Place Wagers: $335.20 (may I add, just ONE of the exactas was worth $302.80 for a deuce, almost entirely negating the other sixteen double-digit place horses all by itself) Exacta:$593.00 Total for published race days on Equibase: Place Wagers: $766.80 Exacta: $1,256.20 Not even close so far. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
She's NOT going to get killed. She will probably prove to have the right side as the mathematics are in her favor ( due to the dispersal of takeout ). It should be pretty close. Seriously, don't take this the wrong way, but this is not a contest of who's right or wrong. It's a very good study. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I would like to know the total number of examples. I just asked the smartest statistical person I know, who knows little to nothing about racing, and he is going to think about it. He did suggest using pools that are larger as they will have little to no random skew. I said we were. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|