![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I liked the guy that pushed Cruz's glove down when he jumped up to make the catch. How is that at least not reviewed? I'm not saying it should have been overturned, but you have to at least review it.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I dont think they can review fan interference can they?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't know. They should be able to.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The system allows instant replay to be used to review boundary home run calls to determine: fair (home run) or foul whether the ball actually left the playing field whether the ball was subject to spectator interference Because the right field ump (who wasn't in position to make an accurate call) decided there was no interference, they didn't review it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() that Holland for Texas was awesome. That was superior long relief going 4 innings that you never see today.
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Side note--If Chuckles runs out Blanton tomorrow with this team's present hitting woes, I'd be feeling really really good with a SF/TEX World Series prop bet ticket in my hand. Reverse mush?!?
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() LOL, Elvis seems like he's going for the Bobo-the-Clown look.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|